LUISS Business School vs Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2 vs Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs LUISS Guido Carli
Side-by-side comparison from 147 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong career focus and job market alignment
- +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
- +International environment and practical application
- +Excellent career preparation and university reputation
- +Modern facilities and enriching academic/personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive environment, especially for international students
- +Practical, real-world application and company connections
- +Strong academic team and mentorship
- +Balanced curriculum of theory, practical skills, and soft skills
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Rigorous academics and top professors
- +Real-world application and practical skills
- +Personal and professional development
- +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
- +Competent and knowledgeable professors
- +Convenient telematics access
- +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
- +International perspective and understanding of the industry
- +Teachers as current specialists
- -Poor organization and low-level course content.
- -Ineffective student coordination and support.
- -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
- -Speedy courses with a lack of depth and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor administrative support and unmotivated professors.
- -Dilapidated and lacking infrastructure.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessionalism and corruption.
- -Unfulfilled promises regarding program quality and career development opportunities.
- -Ineffective communication and a lack of support for student concerns.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Inadequate teaching style and lack of professor accessibility.
- -Poor student support and excessive academic pressure.
- -Language barriers and incompetent staff hinder understanding.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
- -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
- -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.
Internationality and Professors are the university's strongest rated areas. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Value also demonstrate solid performance, while Location sits in the mid-range. The overall impression is one of a university excelling in academic and global aspects, with room for improvement in student housing.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Internationality** (4.78) and **Location** (4.57), indicating a well-connected and globally engaged environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.47). The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation** (3.77), suggesting this aspect may be a weaker point for students. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value also received solid scores.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
This institution garners exceptional marks in its facilities, achieving a score of 4.54. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, both at 4.36, closely followed by location (4.33) and value (4.29). Student life is also a positive aspect, rated at 4.19. The lowest rated area is accommodation, with a score of 3.65.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.
With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.
With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive programs, excellent preparation, and modern facilities. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns about rushed courses and lack of depth.
Most reviews are highly positive (~93%), highlighting a good balance of theory and practice, and valuable industry connections. A small minority (~7%) express significant dissatisfaction with administrative issues, program delivery, and perceived unprofessionalism.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
Nearly 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense, deep courses, real-world challenges, and personal growth. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions an unengaging teaching style and limited student assistance for academic matters.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.
With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.
The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.
The University of Rome tor Vergata is a great and relevantly young University, which is becoming each academic year stronger and more valuable. I graduated from the Global Governance bachelor's degree in English which presented a very interdisciplinary, interconnected and international programme to its students. It is focused on the great challenges and relevant matters of nowadays' world, which shape a strong basis for the next generations of workers and leaders of the upcoming years.
Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.
Nothing to show
The ability of LUISS Guido Carli to foster an excellent learning environment is truly unparalleled. Due to the several committed and capable professors at LUISS Guido Carli, I have had a really positive private involvement. Because I could visit the campus anytime I needed help with my academic schedule, I had a terrific time at LUISS Guido Carli. During my two and a half years there, every instructor was excellent and showed me a lot. I would recommend it to someone who is having trouble deciding what they want to do going forward.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
