KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs University of Namur - Unamur vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 304 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International diversity and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world learning and career preparation
- +Supportive environment and excellent facilities
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +Welcoming environment and diverse student body
- +Support for personal projects and academic programs
- +Student opinions considered in decision-making
- +Expert and passionate faculty sharing real-world experience
- +Welcoming international community and global learning opportunities
- +Responsive administration and accessible, supportive staff
- +Welcoming and supportive environment
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Diverse international and multicultural atmosphere
- +Strong, comprehensive business education
- +Numerous international opportunities
- +Practical, relevant, and up-to-date curriculum
- +Supportive and approachable staff and coaches
- +Practical, practice-oriented teaching methodology
- +Welcoming atmosphere and opportunities to connect with peers
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited career services and support discourage students.
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of communication and student support is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources frustrate students.
- -Course content is often irrelevant and the teaching methods are ineffective.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classes and impersonal teaching styles are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are common complaints.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its international student community, earning the highest rating for internationality. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong score for academic instruction. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, which received the lowest ratings. Student life and location are rated positively, contributing to a generally favorable overall assessment, particularly in terms of value.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
Overall, this institution garners very positive evaluations. Student life stands out with a perfect score, representing its strongest area. Facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all receive excellent marks of 4 or 4.5. Professors are also highly rated at 4.5. No specific weak areas were identified, with all categories scoring at least a 4.
This institution received very positive evaluations. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its strongest asset, earning the highest rating. In contrast, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, though it still remains a respectable rating. Other areas like Location, Value, and Professors also received strong marks, contributing to an overall favorable impression.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities and Internationality stand out with the highest ratings. Student Life, Accomodation, and Value also received very strong scores. Professors are rated highly, though slightly lower than the top categories. Location, with the lowest rating, represents the weakest area among those surveyed.
Internationality stands out as the university's strongest asset, boasting the highest rating. Professors and Value also received notably strong scores. Conversely, Location received the lowest rating, indicating it as a weaker area for the institution. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Accomodation are rated moderately, showing a generally consistent performance across these elements.
An overview of the university's ratings indicates strengths in its **Location**, scoring the highest at 4.44, closely followed by **Professors** (4.21) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Student Life** also received a solid 4.2. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.68 and **Facilities** at 3.92. **Value** sits comfortably in the mid-range at 4.05.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.37/5, students highlight an international atmosphere, practical learning, and supportive staff. A small percentage of reviews mentioned some general courses being less relevant.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted welcoming environments and helpful support for personal projects. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4.41/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent preparation for the workforce, accessible and responsive administration and teachers, and enriching international experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With 4.46/5 average rating from 37 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students highlight the enriching international environment, supportive staff, and practical, engaging courses. No negative reviews were recorded.
Students generally report a positive experience (~100%), highlighting a demanding yet solid foundation in business and management. Recurring themes include opportunities for international experiences and practical, up-to-date course content.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~87% of feedback being highly favorable. Students appreciate practical teaching, dedicated staff, and personal support. No negative reviews were recorded.
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
Nothing to show
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
