SKEMA Business School vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT vs STADIO
Side-by-side comparison from 679 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality formation and practical business programs
- +Diverse international environment and collaborative experiences
- +Strong career support, professional opportunities, and skill development
- +Supportive and experienced lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning
- +Welcoming faculty and smooth transitions
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse and practical programmes
- +Welcoming and accommodating environment
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
- +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
- +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
- +Practical engineering focus and helpful lecturers
- +Welcoming campus environment and diverse community
- +Affordable and quality education
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative and management issues lead to poor communication and disorganization.
- -Faculty are perceived as prioritizing profit over student well-being and academic support.
- -Concerns exist regarding racial discrimination and a lack of guidance for career aspirations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and poor communication.
- -Lack of sufficient resources, equipment, and accommodation is a significant problem.
- -Inconsistent lecturer dedication and unclear career prospects after graduation are concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Accommodation and administrative issues are frequent problems.
- -The university's system is perceived as slow.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Inadequate resources and support.
- -Poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative incompetence and poor management create enrollment difficulties.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
This institution receives commendable evaluations across several key areas. Its strongest performances are noted in **Internationality** (4.39) and **Professors** (4.39), closely followed by **Location** (4.24) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Student Life** (4.14) and **Value** (4.05) also score well. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation** (3.58).
This university demonstrates a commendable performance across key areas, with particularly strong showings in its professors and value for money, both scoring 4.09. Student life and location also received favorable ratings, around 3.8. However, the university's weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.1, and internationality, at 3.45, also presents an opportunity for improvement. Facilities, rated at 3.62, fall in the mid-range.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with particular strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.53. **Facilities** also received a very positive assessment at 4.42. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a score of 3.79. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value fall within a generally favorable range, indicating a well-rounded but not exceptional experience in those aspects.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in **Value** (4.56) and **Professors** (4.33). Facilities (4.29) and Student Life (4.14) also receive positive marks. In contrast, **Location** (3.14) emerges as the weakest area, with Internationality (3.56) also rating moderately. Accommodations are rated at a solid 4.0.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
With a 4.36 average rating from 157 reviews, ~87% highlight quality education, international experiences, and career opportunities. A small ~2.6% of feedback mentions poor communication and organization.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical learning, and rewarding study experiences. A small percentage of feedback (~9%) mentions challenges with accommodation and administrative issues.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
With an average rating of 4.33 out of 5 from 21 reviews, ~85% of students praised the diverse programs, supportive lecturers, and engaging classes. A small minority (~5%) noted issues with registration, slow systems, and occasional accommodation protests.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~89%), praising supportive staff, a healthy environment, and quality education. One reviewer (~11%) experienced issues with administrative processes.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.
I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.
Nothing to show
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
