SKEMA Business School vs University of the People - UoPeople vs Terry College Of Business vs University of California, Santa Barbara - UCSB vs Northern Illinois University - NIU
Side-by-side comparison from 3,253 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Flexible and affordable online learning
- +Global community and diverse perspectives
- +Supportive academic leadership and advising
Nothing to show
- +Quality education and strong academics
- +Supportive professors and helpful instructors
- +Diverse culture and vibrant student life
- +Supportive and engaging professors and staff
- +Positive and inclusive campus community and social life
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Data breach and privacy concerns.
- -High hidden costs from mandatory exam fees.
- -Difficult-to-navigate online learning platform and lack of community features.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Students are frustrated by outdated facilities and resources.
- -Students feel there is a lack of support and engaging teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
This institution receives exceptional marks for its **Internationality** (4.83) and **Professors** (4.74), alongside strong scores in **Value** (4.79). Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 2.91. Other aspects, including Facilities (3.44), Student Life (3.65), and Location (3.36), fall within a moderate range.
Nothing to show
Academically, the university excels, with Professors receiving a notable 4.41 and Value scoring a high 4.29. Facilities and Location also rank well, both above 4.2. However, Accomodation and Internationality present areas for improvement, with scores of 3.82 and 3.88 respectively. Student Life sits in the middle with a respectable 4.18.
Demonstrating an outstanding overall performance, this institution receives top marks in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality, all at a perfect 5. Accommodations stand out as the sole area with a slightly lower, though still very strong, rating of 4.5. Value for money is also highly commended, reflecting a comprehensive and well-regarded university experience.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
~99.6% of reviews are positive, praising flexible, affordable online learning, global community, and supportive faculty. A small fraction (~0.4%) mention navigation difficulties and a data breach.
Nothing to show
University of California reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88%) with students praising quality education, innovative programs, and helpful instructors. A small percentage of feedback mentions challenges with cost of living, workload, and housing.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is 100% positive. Students praise friendly people, good Greek life, and helpful engineering professors.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Studying at University of the People has been a rewarding experience. The tuition-free model made higher education accessible, and the online format allowed me to balance studies with work and family responsibilities. What stood out most was the diverse student community—interacting with classmates from around the world broadened my perspective and enriched discussions. Professors were supportive, and assignments encouraged critical thinking and practical application. On the improvement side, I’d like to see faster grading, more elective options in specialized fields, and stronger career services to help students transition into the workforce. Overall, UoPeople offers a valuable, flexible, and affordable path to higher education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
