SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education
Side-by-side comparison from 1,066 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality formation and practical business programs
- +Diverse international environment and collaborative experiences
- +Strong career support, professional opportunities, and skill development
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Practical engineering focus and helpful lecturers
- +Welcoming campus environment and diverse community
- +Affordable and quality education
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative and management issues lead to poor communication and disorganization.
- -Faculty are perceived as prioritizing profit over student well-being and academic support.
- -Concerns exist regarding racial discrimination and a lack of guidance for career aspirations.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative incompetence and poor management create enrollment difficulties.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
This institution receives commendable evaluations across several key areas. Its strongest performances are noted in **Internationality** (4.39) and **Professors** (4.39), closely followed by **Location** (4.24) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Student Life** (4.14) and **Value** (4.05) also score well. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation** (3.58).
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in **Value** (4.56) and **Professors** (4.33). Facilities (4.29) and Student Life (4.14) also receive positive marks. In contrast, **Location** (3.14) emerges as the weakest area, with Internationality (3.56) also rating moderately. Accommodations are rated at a solid 4.0.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
With a 4.36 average rating from 157 reviews, ~87% highlight quality education, international experiences, and career opportunities. A small ~2.6% of feedback mentions poor communication and organization.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~89%), praising supportive staff, a healthy environment, and quality education. One reviewer (~11%) experienced issues with administrative processes.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
