KU Leuven vs University of Antwerp vs Vlerick Business School vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 263 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous and enriching academic programs
- +Strong international community and diverse student body
- +Well-experienced professors and practical course content
- +Welcoming, approachable, and knowledgeable professors
- +Stimulating, practical, and relevant course content
- +Friendly, inclusive, and collaborative atmosphere
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world experience
- +Accessible, supportive lecturers and small class sizes
- +Modern campus and international environment
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive lecturers and staff
- +Enriching international environment and opportunities
- +Practical and relevant learning experiences
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +International opportunities and cultural awareness
Nothing to show
- -Excessive workloads and limited study spaces.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful staff.
- -Stressful, high-stakes assessment methods.
- -High academic pressure causes significant mental health strain.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Unfair grading and unsupportive instructors.
- -Poor academic programs and high dropout rates.
- -Restrictive international student policies and rising tuition fees are unwelcome.
- -Endless administrative red tape and complicated procedures cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -Communication breakdowns and unhelpful staff create a negative experience.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent scores across several aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.32). Value for money also received a high mark (4.29). Conversely, the weakest area appears to be Accommodation (3.61), though Facilities (4) and Student Life (3.90) remain solid. Professors' ratings (3.87) are also respectable.
This institution receives its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.42) and **Value** (4.30), indicating strong academic and financial offerings. **Location** and **Student Life** also score well, suggesting a positive overall experience. The lowest-rated category is **Internationality** (3.91), which could be an area for potential development. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are solid but not outstanding.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
The university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with location and internationality standing out as its highest-rated aspects. Student life and professor quality also received commendable scores. Accommodation, while still positive, emerged as the area with the lowest rating compared to others. Value and facilities also scored well.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its facilities, achieving a remarkable 4.64. Student life and value also stand out, both scoring above 4.2. Internationality and accommodation are similarly well-regarded. The university's weakest area, comparatively, is its location, rated at 3.94. Professor quality is also solid, at 4.27.
This institution receives consistently strong marks from students. Location stands out as its highest-rated aspect. Professors and student life are also highly praised, along with a good showing for internationality and overall value. Accommodation and facilities, while still solid, represent the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise the rigorous, intellectually enriching academic experience and strong international atmosphere. Limited negative feedback (~5.1%) highlights workload intensity and administrative complexity.
The vast majority of reviews are positive, praising the campus, excellent professors, and enriching experiences. A small percentage of feedback mentions high pressure in studies affecting mental health.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
University reviews are predominantly positive (approx. 98%), praising the practical, project-based learning, accessible lecturers, and new campus facilities. A small amount of negative feedback (approx. 2%) mentions unfair grading in specific programs.
With a 4.42 average rating from 33 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, highlighting enriching international experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A single negative review (~3%) cited restrictive Belgian policies and rising tuition.
With an average rating of 4.12/5 from 51 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive. Students highlight practical learning, approachable lecturers, and international opportunities. A small amount of feedback notes that local language can overwhelm international students and suggests improving school event organization.
Nothing to show
KU Leuven provides a rigorous academic experience with a strong international atmosphere. The programs are demanding but intellectually enriching, encouraging independent study. While administrative processes can be complex, the overall environment supports growth for motivated and self-driven students.
The course was expertly presented and covered practical, relevant, and up-to-date content that gives you a cutting-edge understanding of cross-border company affairs. In addition, I got the opportunity to meet new professionals from other countries.
Nothing to show
I’ve just finished my degree in International Tourism & Leisure at Thomas More, and honestly, it’s been an amazing experience. The program gave me a solid understanding of the tourism and hospitality industry and helped me develop both practical and theoretical skills. What I loved most was the international approach and the hands-on projects with real companies, which really prepared me for the professional world. The professors were always supportive and passionate about what they teach, which made a huge difference. On top of that, I met incredible people from all over the world and made friends for life, which made the experience even more special. Thanks to this degree, I’ve gained not only knowledge but also great opportunities to grow and start my career in tourism. Definitely recommend it to anyone interested in this field!
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Nothing to show
