United International Business Schools - UIBS vs KdG University of Applied Sciences and Arts - KdG vs University of Antwerp vs Antwerp Management School - AMS vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 203 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +International diversity and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world learning and career preparation
- +Supportive environment and excellent facilities
- +Engaging and well-structured programmes with relevant, practical content.
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors fostering a welcoming, collaborative atmosphere.
- +Opportunities for networking and building a strong social and professional community.
- +High-quality Master of Finance program and valuable learning experiences.
- +Limited job placement assistance in Belgium for non-Dutch/French speakers.
- +Expert and passionate faculty sharing real-world experience
- +Welcoming international community and global learning opportunities
- +Responsive administration and accessible, supportive staff
- +Welcoming and supportive environment
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Diverse international and multicultural atmosphere
- +Practical, applicable learning
- +Supportive and understanding lecturers
- +Welcoming, stress-free environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited career services and support discourage students.
- -Intense academic pressure negatively impacts student mental health.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources frustrate students.
- -Course content is often irrelevant and the teaching methods are ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its international student community, earning the highest rating for internationality. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong score for academic instruction. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, which received the lowest ratings. Student life and location are rated positively, contributing to a generally favorable overall assessment, particularly in terms of value.
This institution receives favorable marks across multiple aspects. Its professors are particularly well-regarded, standing out as its strongest area. While accommodation and internationality also received solid scores, internationality is rated slightly lower compared to other surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with key strengths in academic instruction.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring a 4. Areas like **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately well, with **Internationality** and **Value** also performing decently. The lowest score is for **Location**, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
This institution received very positive evaluations. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its strongest asset, earning the highest rating. In contrast, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, though it still remains a respectable rating. Other areas like Location, Value, and Professors also received strong marks, contributing to an overall favorable impression.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities and Internationality stand out with the highest ratings. Student Life, Accomodation, and Value also received very strong scores. Professors are rated highly, though slightly lower than the top categories. Location, with the lowest rating, represents the weakest area among those surveyed.
This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, including facilities, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly rated at 4. However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, with a significantly lower rating of 2. This suggests an excellent overall experience, with the exception of housing options.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.37/5, students highlight an international atmosphere, practical learning, and supportive staff. A small percentage of reviews mentioned some general courses being less relevant.
University feedback is highly positive, with ~97% of 37 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise well-planned courses, excellent lecturers, and a welcoming, inspiring atmosphere. One review mentioned study pressure and mental health concerns.
Two positive reviews highlight quality education and valuable program learning, with an average rating of 3.67/5. The primary recurring theme is the difficulty in finding employment in Belgium without Dutch or French proficiency.
With a 4.41/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent preparation for the workforce, accessible and responsive administration and teachers, and enriching international experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With 4.46/5 average rating from 37 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students highlight the enriching international environment, supportive staff, and practical, engaging courses. No negative reviews were recorded.
The sole review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), rating the university 5/5. Students highlight comfort for international learners, practical programs, engaging activities, and supportive lecturers as key strengths.
Nothing to show
If you are looking for a real business experience and course, definitely apply for IBM at KDG. This degree is awesome. Every day, I get to learn new things from different experts and Lectures, and I fall more in love with the business world.
I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the excellent Legal Technology and Responsible AI Programme. The programme provided a valuable opportunity to deepen my understanding of the legal, regulatory, and technological issues surrounding artificial intelligence and data governance. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Jan Blockx for his outstanding academic leadership and engaging lectures. The course content was well-structured, insightful, and highly relevant to current developments in technology law. His ability to connect legal theory with practical challenges helped participants better understand the opportunities and risks associated with AI and emerging technologies. I would also like to express my gratitude to Prof. Toon Calders for his excellent contribution to the programme. His clear and accessible explanations of AI concepts provided an important technical perspective that complemented the legal discussions. The interdisciplinary approach greatly enhanced the overall learning experience and strengthened participants' understanding of responsible AI. In addition, I would like to thank Nele Voorspoels for her exceptional administrative support. Her prompt communication, attention to detail, and assistance with travel ensured a smooth and enjoyable experience throughout the course. Overall, the programme exceeded my expectations. The combination of high-quality teaching, excellent organization, and meaningful discussions created an inspiring learning environment.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very good experience at the university. There were plenty of friendly and approachable students and teachers, which made for a welcoming environment. I studied the Data Science and Security program, which, at least during my time there, was considerably more programming-focused than I initially expected. This was something to keep in mind when choosing the program. I had some particularly great teachers, especially Collin and Elke. They made my experience much more seamless and valuable through their support and teaching. One area that could have been improved was the scheduling of certain classes, particularly in security. Some sessions were extremely long, which made it difficult to maintain energy and attention throughout the entire class. Since graduating, the campus has also undergone major renovations, and from what I’ve seen, it looks great now. Overall, I look back on my time there positively and feel that the experience provided me with a solid foundation.
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
Nothing to show
