LUISS Business School vs Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Roma Tre - uniroma3 vs LUISS Guido Carli

Side-by-side comparison from 133 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
LUISS Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Rome Business School: wins 0/3 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 2/3 categories
Roma Tre - uniroma3: wins 0/3 categories
LUISS Guido Carli: wins 0/3 categories
John Cabot University: wins 1/3 categories
SHG Universities: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Luxury Brand Management
Best programme: International MBA
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Economics
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
4.23
4.67
3.89
4.54
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.58
4.60
5.00
4.11
4.33
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.33
4.51
4.33
4.11
4.36
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.58
4.80
5.00
3.39
4.36
5.00
5.00
Student life
3.25
4.25
4.33
Win
3.78
4.19
4.00
4.00
Value
3.17
4.44
5.00
3.89
4.29
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.92
3.94
5.00
Win
3.41
3.65
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong career focus and job market alignment
  • +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
  • +International environment and practical application
  • +Practical, real-world application of theory
  • +High-quality faculty with professional experience
  • +Engaging and inspiring learning experiences
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Engaging professors and academic excellence
  • +Supportive campus services and resources
  • +Practical learning experiences and internships
  • +Rigorous academics and top professors
  • +Real-world application and practical skills
  • +Personal and professional development
  • +Structured learning and international community
  • +Positive location and good opportunities
  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Poor organization and low-level course content.
  • -Ineffective student coordination and support.
  • -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessionalism and corruption.
  • -Lack of promised resources and outdated/inadequate course content.
  • -Difficulty reaching staff and unresolved technical/system issues.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
  • -Inadequate teaching style and lack of professor accessibility.
  • -Poor student support and excessive academic pressure.
  • -Language barriers and incompetent staff hinder understanding.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of effective communication
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.

A generally positive university review highlights exceptional strength in **Internationality**, scoring a near-perfect 4.8. **Location** also stands out with a high rating of 4.6. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score, at 3.94, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value also garnered strong marks above 4.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

The university garners praise in several key areas, with professors and location both receiving the highest marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present the weakest aspects, scoring lower than other categories. The overall value proposition is rated positively, reflecting a balanced but uneven performance.

This institution garners exceptional marks in its facilities, achieving a score of 4.54. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, both at 4.36, closely followed by location (4.33) and value (4.29). Student life is also a positive aspect, rated at 4.19. The lowest rated area is accommodation, with a score of 3.65.

With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), praising practical learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~6%) of feedback highlights issues with diploma delivery, administrative support, and perceived unprofessionalism.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive. Students commend professors' competence and teaching, engaging course content, and organized campus services. A small portion of feedback notes a theoretical approach in some fields.

Nearly 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense, deep courses, real-world challenges, and personal growth. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions an unengaging teaching style and limited student assistance for academic matters.

Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
8%
70%
100%
56%
46%
0%
100%
4★
33%
20%
0%
22%
39%
100%
0%
3★
50%
4%
0%
22%
7%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Very basic courses

The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.

Great year

Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. ​Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My university life

The ability of LUISS Guido Carli to foster an excellent learning environment is truly unparalleled. Due to the several committed and capable professors at LUISS Guido Carli, I have had a really positive private involvement. Because I could visit the campus anytime I needed help with my academic schedule, I had a terrific time at LUISS Guido Carli. During my two and a half years there, every instructor was excellent and showed me a lot. I would recommend it to someone who is having trouble deciding what they want to do going forward.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close