LUISS Business School vs Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2 vs Rome Business School vs Roma Tre - uniroma3 vs Guglielmo Marconi University

Side-by-side comparison from 134 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The American University of Rome (4.80)
LUISS Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Università di Roma Tor Vergata - uniroma2: wins 0/6 categories
Rome Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Roma Tre - uniroma3: wins 0/6 categories
Guglielmo Marconi University: wins 0/6 categories
The American University of Rome: wins 3/6 categories
John Cabot University: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Luxury Brand Management
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Arts and Culture Management
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.17
3.88
4.16
3.89
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
Location
4.58
3.57
4.61
4.11
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.33
4.23
4.48
4.11
4.00
4.75
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.58
4.30
4.76
3.39
2.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Student life
3.25
3.80
4.23
3.78
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
3.17
4.20
4.35
3.89
4.00
4.75
Win
4.00
Accommodation
2.92
3.32
3.76
3.41
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong career focus and job market alignment
  • +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
  • +International environment and practical application
  • +Excellent career preparation and university reputation
  • +Modern facilities and enriching academic/personal growth opportunities
  • +Supportive environment, especially for international students
  • +Industry connections and real-world application opportunities
  • +Insightful and professionally active faculty
  • +Diverse and global learning environment
  • +Engaging professors and academic excellence
  • +Supportive campus services and resources
  • +Practical learning experiences and internships
  • +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
  • +Competent and knowledgeable professors
  • +Convenient telematics access
  • +Small class sizes and personalized attention
  • +Strong academic programs with hands-on experience
  • +Cultural immersion and vibrant community in Rome
  • +Structured learning and international community
  • +Positive location and good opportunities
Cons
  • -Poor organization and low-level course content.
  • -Ineffective student coordination and support.
  • -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
  • -Speedy courses with a lack of depth and outdated curriculum.
  • -Poor administrative support and unmotivated professors.
  • -Dilapidated and lacking infrastructure.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Course content and offerings do not meet expectations.
  • -Lack of support and professionalism from staff is a recurring theme.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
  • -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
  • -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
  • -Unresponsive or unsupportive staff further detract from the student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of effective communication
Rating summary
What students say

This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.

Internationality and Professors are the university's strongest rated areas. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Value also demonstrate solid performance, while Location sits in the mid-range. The overall impression is one of a university excelling in academic and global aspects, with room for improvement in student housing.

An analysis of university ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring above 4.6. **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive favorable marks, indicating positive academic and social environments. **Facilities** and **Value** are well-regarded, though slightly lower than the top-tier categories. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, suggesting it may be a point for improvement.

The university garners praise in several key areas, with professors and location both receiving the highest marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present the weakest aspects, scoring lower than other categories. The overall value proposition is rated positively, reflecting a balanced but uneven performance.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, notably achieving perfect scores in Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Professors and Value also received exceptionally high marks. While Facilities are rated well, they represent the lowest score among the surveyed areas. Internationality also stands out as a strong point, though slightly below the top-tier ratings.

With exceptional scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality, the university demonstrates considerable strengths. Student Life and Value also receive positive feedback, indicating a generally well-rounded experience. The primary area for improvement lies in Accomodation, which received the lowest rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting comprehensive programs, excellent preparation, and modern facilities. A small portion (~4.6%) express concerns about rushed courses and lack of depth.

~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, valuable industry connections, and insightful professors. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with diploma delivery, unprofessionalism, and unmet expectations.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive. Students commend professors' competence and teaching, engaging course content, and organized campus services. A small portion of feedback notes a theoretical approach in some fields.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise the intimate learning environment, personalized attention, and opportunities for personal and academic growth within Rome's vibrant culture.

Based on one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. The program is praised for its structure and international community, though some opportunities may be less accessible than presented.

Rating distribution
5★
8%
41%
67%
56%
0%
75%
0%
4★
33%
43%
20%
22%
100%
25%
100%
3★
50%
11%
6%
22%
0%
0%
0%
2★
8%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Very basic courses

The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.

Global Governance qualities given to UNIRoma2

The University of Rome tor Vergata is a great and relevantly young University, which is becoming each academic year stronger and more valuable. I graduated from the Global Governance bachelor's degree in English which presented a very interdisciplinary, interconnected and international programme to its students. It is focused on the great challenges and relevant matters of nowadays' world, which shape a strong basis for the next generations of workers and leaders of the upcoming years.

RBS Business Simulation Game Experience.

Participating in the Business Simulation Game as part of my MBA at Rome Business School was one of the most practical and impactful experiences of the program, It provided a realistic environment to test strategic decision making under pressure and highlighted the strong interdependence between market dynamics, operational performance, cost discipline, people management, pricing strategy and profitability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A home far away from home

The American University of Rome is a home away from home where one finds their true selves with little to no effort. The small community has so much more to offer beyond the roman neighborhoods, the live full and generous community. You have numerous opportunities such as internships and workshops to deepen the knowledge and interest in your course. All this in the beautiful Rome!

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close