University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs SKEMA Business School vs Simon Business School vs University of Rochester vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT
Side-by-side comparison from 265 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
Nothing to show
- +Strong faculty knowledge and approachable professors
- +Diverse and friendly student community with ample extracurriculars
- +Excellent student resources and research opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
- +High-quality educational programs
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
- +Strong scientific foundations and practical learning
- +Supportive environment with approachable professors and well-equipped labs
- +Opportunities for personal and professional development through student associations
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are seen as inconsistent and lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course relevance leads to boredom.
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
Nothing to show
This institution garners high marks for its **Internationality**, receiving an impressive 4.3. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0, with strong scores for Facilities and Accommodation (both 3.8), and a solid 3.9 for Value. Student Life also scores well at 3.6. The primary area for improvement identified is Location, which received a lower rating of 2.7.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a strong offering, particularly excelling in **Value**, where it achieved a perfect score. Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all received commendable ratings of 4. The weakest areas identified were Facilities and Internationality, both scoring a 3.
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.1/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting course connection, research evidence, diverse friends, and helpful professors. Limited negative feedback (~0%) was noted regarding advisors and conflicting information.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.
Students highly praise the faculty, highlighting valuable professional and personal experiences (~100% positive). Recurring themes include strong scientific foundations, practical work, approachable professors, and supportive community.
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
