University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Simon Business School vs University of Rochester vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT
Side-by-side comparison from 172 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Strong faculty knowledge and approachable professors
- +Diverse and friendly student community with ample extracurriculars
- +Excellent student resources and research opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
- +High-quality educational programs
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
- +Caring professors and strong community support
- +Enriching international environment and connections
- +Inspiring location and career development opportunities
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are seen as inconsistent and lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of effective teaching and learning resources.
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Nothing to show
This institution garners high marks for its **Internationality**, receiving an impressive 4.3. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0, with strong scores for Facilities and Accommodation (both 3.8), and a solid 3.9 for Value. Student Life also scores well at 3.6. The primary area for improvement identified is Location, which received a lower rating of 2.7.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.
The university garners positive feedback across several key aspects. Location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.62. Student life and internationality also score highly, both exceeding 4.5. Conversely, accommodation receives the lowest score at 4.20, representing the weakest area. Facilities, professors, and value maintain solid ratings, all above 4.4.
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.1/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting course connection, research evidence, diverse friends, and helpful professors. Limited negative feedback (~0%) was noted regarding advisors and conflicting information.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.
All 66 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight a strong sense of community, supportive and knowledgeable professors, and valuable international experiences. The university's location and resources are also frequently praised.
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
