EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs ESDEN Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO
Side-by-side comparison from 475 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body
- +High-quality academic content and experienced professors
- +Personal and professional growth through engaging methods
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with practical insights
- +Innovative and engaging business programs
- +High-quality, enriching programs
- +Experienced, industry-expert professors
- +Comprehensive, practical knowledge acquisition
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and high-quality student community
- +Well-structured learning and accessible resources
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and inflexibility.
- -Program content may lack depth or deviate from initial promises.
- -Facilities are new but student experience is negatively impacted by rigid policies.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -The quality of education and teaching is often perceived as basic and unengaging.
- -Facilities and academic support are frequently criticized as inadequate.
- -Lack of recognition and unclear accreditation of the university.
- -Inflated admissions leading to underprepared classmates.
- -Misleading information regarding the institution's location and affiliation.
- -Poor academic quality and irrelevant degrees.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of administrative support.
- -Poor organization and unfulfilled internship promises.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
With an impressive score of 4.93, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, internationality, and facilities also received very high marks, all exceeding 4.5. Conversely, accommodation represents the weakest area, scoring 4.11. Professors and value for money are rated favorably, in the mid-4s, demonstrating a generally well-regarded institution.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. **Professors** and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
A strong showing in academic and location aspects is evident, with professors receiving an impressive 4.8 rating and location scoring 4.6. However, the university's facilities and overall value are identified as weaker areas, both receiving a rating of 3. Student life, accommodation, and internationality fall in the mid-range, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.
This university demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving a near-perfect score, and its **Location** is also highly praised. The quality of its **Professors** is another area of significant achievement. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest aspect, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
University reviews indicate ~93% satisfaction, praising excellent academic quality, practical/international approaches, and knowledgeable professors. A small minority (~2.3%) noted issues with course communication and administrative flexibility.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse networks, knowledgeable professors, and an engaging international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~7.7%) notes disorganization and basic education.
With an average rating of 3.29/5 and ~57% positive reviews, students praise the quality of courses and experienced professors. A few negative reviews (~29%) express disappointment with accreditation and a lack of university recognition.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and engaging lecturers, a diverse community, and well-structured assignments. A small portion of feedback (~9.1%) mentions a lack of organization and insufficient internship support.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
What I value most about the master is the staff of professors who had extensive experience in various industries, sectors and areas. The convergence of these experiences allowed the classes to be interesting and enriching.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
