SKEMA Business School vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT vs STADIO
Side-by-side comparison from 668 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors
- +Practical, career-focused education
- +Student-centered support and safety
- +Excellent support services and helpful faculty
- +Vibrant and organized campus life with social activities
- +Beautiful campus environment conducive to study
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning and industry connections
- +Welcoming and engaging campus environment
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
- +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
- +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Engaging and well-structured learning experiences
- +Supportive and friendly campus environment
- +Innovative programs with modern technology and effective module structures
- +Committed faculty with real-world insights and supportive administration
- +Global and inclusive environment fostering personal development and leadership
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -- Administrative and communication issues are a significant problem.
- -- Lack of resources and outdated facilities hinder learning.
- -- Accommodation and student support services are insufficient.
- -Lack of practical experience and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on targets over academics.
- -Language barriers making academic engagement difficult.
- -Persistent accommodation problems and administrative errors with marks.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Inadequate resources and support.
- -Poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and lack of student support.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the university is poor and dismissive of student concerns.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
Generally positive feedback emerges from the university's ratings, with professors and value for money receiving the highest scores at 4.08. Student life and location also score well, both at 3.8. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating at 3.12, and internationality, scoring 3.43. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.63.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Value for money stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities. Student Life and Professors also receive commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower than the top-performing metrics.
This university scores exceptionally well in **Location (4.5)** and **Facilities (4.39)**, indicating these are its strongest aspects. Student life, professors, and value also receive solid ratings. The **Accomodation (3.72)** is the lowest-rated area, suggesting room for improvement, while Internationality also falls slightly below the average of other categories.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.
This university's student feedback indicates a strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.2 and above. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received high marks, close to 4.0. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are areas for improvement, with lower scores. **Internationality** sits in the mid-range. Overall, the university excels in student experience and perceived worth, with physical campus aspects and housing needing attention.
Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both achieving 4.8. **Accommodations** also received a very high rating of 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, **Student Life** registered the lowest score at 4.25, though it remains a solid rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high level of satisfaction across its facilities, professors, and value.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
Around ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good instructors and practical, career-focused education. Negative feedback (~9.8%) mentions issues with academic records, accommodation shortages, and some safety concerns.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 414 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campuses, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. Very minimal negative feedback exists.
With a 4.3/5 average rating and ~85% positive feedback, students praise hands-on learning, supportive lecturers, and engaging campus life. A small amount of feedback (~5%) mentioned issues with online registration and accommodation.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.
~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal growth, valuable learning experiences, and enjoyable campus life. A very small percentage of feedback (~3%) expresses frustration with administrative responsiveness.
With an average rating of 4.6/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern technology, lecturer support, and engaging module structures. No negative feedback was reported.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.
I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.
Walter Sisulu University is a rural university that offers accessibility to students from mostly underprivileged backgrounds. Some of its facilities and processes showed this. However, it is well known for its excellent medical programmes. My experience was mostly positve albeit with a few glitches here and there. Overall, I would recommend it as I myself am planning to go back for my Master's degree.
Nothing to show
