SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 628 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Engaging and well-structured learning experiences
- +Supportive and friendly campus environment
- +Innovative programs with modern technology and effective module structures
- +Committed faculty with real-world insights and supportive administration
- +Global and inclusive environment fostering personal development and leadership
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and lack of student support.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the university is poor and dismissive of student concerns.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
This university's student feedback indicates a strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.2 and above. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received high marks, close to 4.0. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are areas for improvement, with lower scores. **Internationality** sits in the mid-range. Overall, the university excels in student experience and perceived worth, with physical campus aspects and housing needing attention.
Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both achieving 4.8. **Accommodations** also received a very high rating of 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, **Student Life** registered the lowest score at 4.25, though it remains a solid rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high level of satisfaction across its facilities, professors, and value.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal growth, valuable learning experiences, and enjoyable campus life. A very small percentage of feedback (~3%) expresses frustration with administrative responsiveness.
With an average rating of 4.6/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern technology, lecturer support, and engaging module structures. No negative feedback was reported.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Walter Sisulu University is a rural university that offers accessibility to students from mostly underprivileged backgrounds. Some of its facilities and processes showed this. However, it is well known for its excellent medical programmes. My experience was mostly positve albeit with a few glitches here and there. Overall, I would recommend it as I myself am planning to go back for my Master's degree.
Nothing to show
