Cleveland State University - CSU vs SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Case Western Reserve University vs Chamberlain University

Side-by-side comparison from 271 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Cleveland State University - CSU (4.70)
Cleveland State University - CSU: wins 5/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
Case Western Reserve University: wins 0/7 categories
Chamberlain University: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
99 reviews
×
Best programme: History
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Downers Grove, Illinois, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Nursing
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.64
Win
4.21
3.67
4.25
4.00
3.43
3.83
Location
4.76
4.24
5.00
Win
4.00
4.33
4.64
4.92
Professors
4.77
Win
4.41
4.00
4.56
4.33
3.86
4.58
Internationality
4.60
4.35
3.67
3.56
4.00
4.50
4.92
Win
Student life
4.63
Win
4.10
3.33
4.00
4.00
4.07
4.08
Value
4.45
Win
4.03
4.00
4.33
4.00
3.64
4.17
Accommodation
4.49
Win
3.56
3.00
4.22
4.00
2.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional faculty expertise and mentorship
  • +Excellent learning opportunities and engaging instruction
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment with top-notch amenities
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Expert and invested faculty
  • +Real-world application focus
  • +State-of-the-art facilities
  • +Outstanding academic programs and excellent, attentive faculty
  • +Pleasant campus and welcoming environment
  • +Practical, relevant curriculum for future careers
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inflexible and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching methods leads to disinterest.
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Excessive fees and poor communication regarding them.
  • -Limited parking and lack of accessible options.
  • -Outdated technology and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly for its professors, who received the highest marks. Students also appreciate the location and facilities. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and the value proposition, though these still maintain solid scores. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive student experience.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Academic and accommodation aspects of this university receive notable praise, with professors scoring highest at 4.56 and value at 4.33. Facilities also rate well at 4.25, with accommodation close behind at 4.22. Student life and location are rated solidly at 4.0. The weakest area identified is internationality, with a score of 3.56.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in its **professors and location**, both rated at an impressive 4.33. Areas such as facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received solid ratings of 4, indicating a generally positive experience across these aspects. While no single category falls significantly short, the professors and location stand out as key strengths.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (98 out of 99) reviews are positive, with students praising excellent faculty, strong mentorship, engaging instruction, and useful course material. They also highlight good amenities and an inclusive environment. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise dedicated professors, innovative teaching, and state-of-the-art facilities, highlighting research opportunities and academic challenge.

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise the academic programs, faculty attention, and the campus environment as beneficial and attractive for learning.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
69%
49%
33%
33%
0%
21%
67%
4★
30%
42%
67%
67%
100%
50%
25%
3★
1%
7%
0%
0%
0%
43%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close