SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Terry College Of Business vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 210 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Gwynedd Mercy University (5.00)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 0/6 categories
Terry College Of Business: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/6 categories
Northwood University: wins 1/6 categories
Gwynedd Mercy University: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Athens, Georgia, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Midland, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
47 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
3.67
Not rated
3.43
3.83
4.40
4.50
Win
Location
4.25
5.00
Not rated
4.64
4.92
3.98
5.00
Professors
4.42
4.00
Not rated
3.86
4.58
4.53
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.36
3.67
Not rated
4.50
4.92
Win
4.43
4.50
Student life
4.11
3.33
Not rated
4.07
4.08
4.10
5.00
Win
Value
4.03
4.00
Not rated
3.64
4.17
4.23
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.57
3.00
Not rated
2.50
3.67
4.36
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +strong international exposure & opportunities
  • +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
  • +valuable alumni network & career support
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
  • +Engaging and personalized teaching by experienced professors
  • +Strong focus on practical, hands-on, and experiential learning
  • +Development of critical thinking and employability skills
  • +Friendly and supportive atmosphere with engaged professors
  • +Beautiful and safe campus with diverse activities
  • +Competitive and rewarding programs, especially nursing
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of faculty support and communication is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency causes significant frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

This institution garners strong acclaim, particularly for its **Professors**, who received the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also stand out with excellent scores. Conversely, **Location** is identified as the weakest area, receiving the lowest marks among the surveyed aspects. The university presents a generally positive picture with solid student life and accommodation experiences.

This university receives outstanding marks, particularly for its professors, location, student life, and overall value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and internationality also impress with strong 4.5 ratings. The only area slightly lower is accommodation, with a 4. Accommodations stand out as the relatively weakest aspect compared to other highly-rated categories.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Nothing to show

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.45/5, students praise visionary, engaging professors and the university's focus on innovation and experiential learning, leading to high employability.

With 100% positive feedback, students praise Gwynedd Mercy University for its friendly professors, engaging activities, and beautiful campus. They also highlight the affordability of accommodation and a supportive atmosphere.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
33%
0%
21%
67%
45%
100%
4★
42%
67%
0%
50%
25%
55%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close