EADA Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 371 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and practical application
- +Enriching international and multi-cultural environment
- +Supportive and welcoming community and staff
- +Flexible online and on-campus study options
- +High-quality faculty and practical, well-structured curriculum
- +Supportive community and international environment
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Practical and professional-led programs
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Engaging academic environment and relevant courses
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Practical, engaging learning with real-world application
- +User-friendly, modern online platform and efficient administration
- +Excellent facilities and creative space
- +Access to industry professionals and top restaurants
- +Comprehensive administrative and career-focused curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and ineffective processes.
- -Lack of promised program focus.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Low educational quality & irrelevant programs
- -Lack of student support & career assistance
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unqualified and unprofessional instructors
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Limited class time and poor value for full-time tuition.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and resources for students is frequently mentioned.
This institution garners notable acclaim, particularly for its exceptional location, which received the highest rating. Internationality and student life also stand out as strong points. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect compared to other assessed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a generally positive standing across various university life elements.
When considering university feedback, internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Location and professors also score very well. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. Facilities and student life are moderately rated, while value falls in the middle.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
The university garners a generally positive assessment from students. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.27. Conversely, Internationality received the lowest score at 3.76. Other categories such as Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are all rated well above 4, indicating a solid overall experience, with Student Life also scoring respectably at 3.94.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly in **Internationality (4.82)**, **Professors (4.77)**, and **Value (4.73)**. The **Student Life (4.68)** and **Facilities (4.68)** are also highly regarded. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still strong, scores include **Location (4.47)** and **Accomodation (4.47)**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
This institution presents a well-rounded academic and student experience. Its strongest points are the excellent location and vibrant student life, both receiving perfect scores. While all other areas are rated highly at a 4 out of 5, there are no significant weaknesses to report. Facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all contribute to a positive overall impression.
Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic quality, expert professors, and enriching multicultural environments. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) mentioned issues with course communication and administrative inflexibility.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility, quality professors, and community. Negative feedback, about 14.3%, points to administrative issues and perceived low educational quality.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~78% of feedback), highlighting excellent academic environments, engaged faculty, and great learning opportunities. A small portion (~5.6%) of feedback notes issues with staff or program management.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With a 4.82/5 average rating from 22 reviews, ~95% of students highlight excellent professors, engaging online and on-campus programs, and practical application. One review found the full-time option not worthwhile.
With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight excellent equipment and creative space. They also appreciate professional classes and valuable administrative knowledge for culinary careers.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
The overall experience was ok. Yet I dont feel that it was worth 10k€ a year for what I received. Starting from repetitive classes in each year but with a different name until not having bathrooms for almost 6 months. The quality of the majority of classes was 2/5. The content of the classes was not deep enough to teach you about tools, appliances, ways of solving, what should be taken into consideration. On my 2 last years. I took the exact same class of public relations but named differently. Not even the professor knew what to say any more. I didn’t saw not event one tool that is used in public relations. We analyzed just one case of public relations in the whole semester. And it was a mention not event a full analysis. I do not recommend GBSB. The internships they say the help you with on their webpage its a lie. They do not help you in any way to connect you with no company. They are not event informed in how to help you with the visa.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
