University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs Prague University of Economics and Business - VSE vs Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs Anglo-American University - AAU

Side-by-side comparison from 218 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Ostrava (4.80)
University of New York in Prague - UNYP: wins 0/7 categories
Prague University of Economics and Business - VSE: wins 4/7 categories
Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT: wins 0/7 categories
Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT: wins 0/7 categories
Anglo-American University - AAU: wins 1/7 categories
Palacký University Olomouc - UPOL: wins 1/7 categories
University of Ostrava: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Psychology
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Applied Chemistry
Rochester, New York, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Anthropology
Ostrava, Czech Republic
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: English Philology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.18
5.00
Win
4.46
4.24
4.43
4.20
4.47
Location
4.89
5.00
Win
4.15
3.89
4.61
4.60
4.52
Professors
4.37
4.00
4.31
4.38
4.48
4.00
4.60
Win
Internationality
4.65
5.00
Win
4.00
4.36
4.55
3.80
4.33
Student life
4.47
3.00
4.31
4.31
4.56
Win
4.40
4.47
Value
4.28
5.00
Win
4.31
4.10
4.47
4.00
4.56
Accommodation
3.85
4.00
3.85
4.03
4.20
4.50
Win
4.15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Personal, individual, and supportive student approach
  • +Engaging, practical, and critical thinking-focused classes
  • +Knowledgeable professors with real-world expertise
  • +Excellent academic reputation and faculty expertise
  • +Practical learning opportunities and career connections
  • +Supportive learning environment and structured curriculum
  • +Expert faculty & modern, practical curriculum
  • +Strong career support & global recognition
  • +Well-regarded technical programs
  • +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
  • +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
  • +Supportive, engaging professors and a strong sense of community.
  • +Diverse international environment and opportunities for global connections.
  • +Rewarding, fulfilling experience with career launching potential and unique learning opportunities.
  • +Diverse international environment and motivating education.
  • +Practical curriculum with knowledgeable and helpful professors.
  • +Hands-on learning opportunities and vibrant campus life.
  • +Strong community and supportive teachers.
  • +Modern campus and facilities.
  • +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unresponsiveness from instructors are major concerns.
  • -Rote memorization over critical thinking is prioritized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and the overall experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student success.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs exceptionally well in **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Student life** and **internationality** also received very high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category. Other areas like **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** received solid, positive scores, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.

With top marks in facilities, location, internationality, and value, this institution excels in providing a well-equipped and accessible environment. Student life, however, received a more modest rating, suggesting room for improvement in that specific area. Accommodation and professor quality are also considered strong points.

This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.46. Professors, student life, and overall value are also well-regarded, all receiving a consistent 4.31. Internationality sits at a solid 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.85, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.

Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated category. Student life and internationality are also highly regarded, reflecting a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. Accommodations received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities, professors, and value all maintain solid, positive scores, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience.

This university garners strong marks across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.6) and **Student Life** (4.4). **Accomodation** also scores highly at 4.5. However, the university's **Internationality** is a relative weakness, receiving a rating of 3.8, indicating an area for potential improvement compared to its other strong attributes.

Professors stand out with an impressive rating, reflecting a particular strength in academic instruction. The university also scores highly in location and value. Accommodation presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement compared to other aspects of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid, well-rounded performance.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 46 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.65/5. Students praise the personal approach, engaging and practical classes, and supportive, knowledgeable professors.

University reviews are largely positive, with ~60% of feedback being favorable. Students highlight strong program reputation and career connections. A smaller portion of feedback (~20%) criticizes the curriculum for being too theoretical and rote memorization-focused.

With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, useful projects, and career help, noting high-quality, modern education and opportunities for internships and jobs.

With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.

All 65 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.51/5. Recurring themes include a strong sense of community, supportive and engaging professors, and a valuable international environment.

With a 4.2/5 average rating from 5 reviews, students highlight a strong positive experience. Recurring themes include a well-structured, practical curriculum, helpful professors, and a vibrant campus life, with ~0% negative feedback.

With a 4.8/5 average rating from 45 reviews, students praise the strong sense of community, wonderful professors, and modern, welcoming campus. There are no reported negative experiences.

Rating distribution
5★
65%
20%
38%
21%
53%
20%
80%
4★
35%
40%
56%
77%
52%
80%
20%
3★
0%
20%
6%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Teacher enthusiasm and quality of educatoin

I really like UNYP because the teachers are so enthusiastic about the subjects they teach. Generally, most of the lessons were very interesting and engaging, and I truly enjoyed them. The teachers are experts in their respective fields, and it's always fun to talk to them about research and ideas. Additionally, I would really like to point out the opportunities, general contacts and experiences in psychology!

Lots of memorizing, less thinking

At this university, you need to memorize tons of information - most of it you will never ever use + you will forget it right after the exam. Students are not encouraged to use their brains and to come up with their own solutions, but to just absorb the information the teacher gives them. I got As and Bs but haven't learn almost anything.

Quality of CVUT

Firstly, I would like to mention that CVUT is one of the best unis in Czech Republic. After graduating it gives a plenty of opportunities to work since its certificate is recognised around the world in huge companies. It’s not a secret that not all of the students can work while studying, it’s quite difficult to study there but it worth it. Inside, every faculty’s building is modern. Especially FIT, where I am studying now looks great. Professors and tutors create opportunity to study, they can answer to all your questions if there are. Secondly, getting to the uni is not that difficult even if you live far from it. Transportation in public is so developed and trams can get you anywhere quickly. For instance, I am living in Prague 3 and uni is located in Prague 6, even though in map it the distance could be seen so far, by using tram I get to the uni in 20-30 minutes. To sum up, it can be difficult to study there and subject can be hard too but it worth it since after it creates you a huge opportunity to work in successful companies without any doubt.

Nothing to show

Quality and experience!

I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close