SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs Rhodes University - RU vs North-West University - NWU

Side-by-side comparison from 716 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International School of Management (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
International School of Management: wins 7/7 categories
Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT: wins 0/7 categories
Rhodes University - RU: wins 0/7 categories
North-West University - NWU: wins 0/7 categories
Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT: wins 0/7 categories
Eduvos - eduvos: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Information and Communication Technology
Grahamstown, South Africa
4.40
Read more reviews
26 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts
Potchefstroom, South Africa
4.40
Read more reviews
415 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Information Technology
Johannesburg, South Africa
3.70
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Humanities
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
4.64
Win
3.62
4.00
4.27
4.42
4.20
Location
4.32
4.64
Win
3.93
3.40
4.11
4.53
4.14
Professors
4.37
4.82
Win
4.09
4.42
4.20
4.19
3.87
Internationality
4.43
4.82
Win
3.45
4.31
3.96
3.95
3.80
Student life
4.25
4.50
Win
3.80
4.12
4.21
4.22
3.73
Value
4.09
4.73
Win
4.09
4.50
4.38
4.14
3.73
Accommodation
3.70
4.64
Win
3.10
3.76
3.92
3.79
3.29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +Supportive and experienced lecturers
  • +Practical, hands-on learning
  • +Welcoming faculty and smooth transitions
  • +Supportive administration and lecturers
  • +Engaged learning and academic development
  • +Inclusive culture and vibrant campus life
  • +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
  • +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
  • +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Diverse and practical programmes
  • +Welcoming and accommodating environment
  • +Small class sizes and lecturer support
  • +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
  • +Streamlined application process
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause delays and poor communication.
  • -Lack of sufficient resources, equipment, and accommodation is a significant problem.
  • -Inconsistent lecturer dedication and unclear career prospects after graduation are concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
  • -Some lecturers are disengaged and prioritize their own research.
  • -Outdated infrastructure and limited support services cause significant problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
  • -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
  • -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
  • -Accommodation and administrative issues are frequent problems.
  • -The university's system is perceived as slow.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
  • -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
  • -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

This university demonstrates a commendable performance across key areas, with particularly strong showings in its professors and value for money, both scoring 4.09. Student life and location also received favorable ratings, around 3.8. However, the university's weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.1, and internationality, at 3.45, also presents an opportunity for improvement. Facilities, rated at 3.62, fall in the mid-range.

Academic offerings and global engagement are clear strengths, with Professors and Internationality receiving high marks. Value also stands out as a significant positive. Conversely, Location is the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting this could be an area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life are generally well-regarded, as is Accomodation.

This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with particular strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.53. **Facilities** also received a very positive assessment at 4.42. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a score of 3.79. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value fall within a generally favorable range, indicating a well-rounded but not exceptional experience in those aspects.

This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical learning, and rewarding study experiences. A small percentage of feedback (~9%) mentions challenges with accommodation and administrative issues.

Most students praise Rhodes University's quick administration, supportive lecturers, and vibrant culture. A small percentage noted concerns with specific departments, lecturer focus, or infrastructure like water cuts.

Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.

With an average rating of 4.33 out of 5 from 21 reviews, ~85% of students praised the diverse programs, supportive lecturers, and engaging classes. A small minority (~5%) noted issues with registration, slow systems, and occasional accommodation protests.

About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
64%
30%
58%
49%
57%
13%
4★
41%
36%
49%
31%
39%
29%
53%
3★
7%
0%
11%
8%
11%
10%
27%
2★
1%
0%
6%
4%
1%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
4%
0%
0%
5%
7%
Most useful review
Most liked
Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

E-learning open 24/7

The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!

Nothing to show

Good

One thing I can say is the support services are very helpful. From class reps who stand on students behalf to communicate with lecturers to facilitators who do group sessions to prepare students for tests and exams and tutors who personally help students individually to clear uncertainties . Lecturers are welcome and willing to help students at all times. It's a great institution.

I'm doing Environmental health science currently

It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.

DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME AND MONEY

Whatever you do, do not enroll with this facility if you have already completed subject that is in another course that you want to enroll in. they do not give you the option to apply for recognition of prior learning, and the subject are of a lessor standard that what I have completed. they will waste your money, phone your next of kin regarding an account where they owe you money on. Their admin department is seriously in need of education and accounts department are already in possession of my account details to refund what I could manage to cancel without it costing me more that what they have taken due to them not answering emails either. I have also referred this to SAICA for review of their standards and ethics.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close