SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs University of Massachusetts Amherst - UMass Amherst vs Amherst College vs The University of Akron - UA
Side-by-side comparison from 173 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Abundant research and internship opportunities.
- +Excellent campus facilities and beautiful surroundings.
- +Vibrant student life and engaging academic programs.
- +Excellent academics and supportive professors.
- +Generous financial aid and diverse student body.
- +Liberal arts focus with flexible course options.
- +Engaging, knowledgeable, and committed professors
- +Supportive and stimulating learning environment
- +Excellent campus life and community events
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and communication is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum relevance
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of career support and outdated curriculum are concerning.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This institution garners strong commendations across several key areas. Student life stands out as its most highly rated aspect, closely followed by accommodation and value. However, facilities and internationality received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating these might be areas for development. The university also performs well in its professor quality and location.
The university receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Notably, it excels with perfect scores for accommodation, professors, and internationality, along with a near-perfect rating for facilities and student life. Its location is its relatively weakest point, though still rated highly at 4. Value for money also stands out with a perfect score.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its facilities and location, both receiving perfect scores. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are also highly regarded, all earning a solid 4.5 out of 5. Professors are rated slightly lower, at 4.5, but still represent a very positive aspect of the institution.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 9 reviews, approximately 89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight research opportunities, campus life, and dining options. There are no negative reviews.
With two out of two reviews being positive, students praise the phenomenal academics, excellent professors, and generous financial aid. The liberal arts education is described as well-rounded and rewarding.
Two reviews show a highly positive sentiment, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, a mentally stimulating and friendly department, and the university's supportive environment for success.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
