KU Leuven vs University of Antwerp vs Vlerick Business School vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs UCLL University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 258 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous and enriching academic programs
- +Strong international community and diverse student body
- +Well-experienced professors and practical course content
- +Practical, relevant content and scenario-based learning
- +Friendly, inclusive, and collaborative atmosphere
- +Networking opportunities and meeting diverse professionals
- +Rigorous, well-structured programs with real-world application
- +Expert faculty deeply invested in student success
- +Strong industry connections and career focus
- +Small classes and accessible, supportive lecturers
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Modern campus facilities and vibrant student city
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive lecturers and staff
- +Enriching international environment and opportunities
- +Practical, real-world relevant programmes
- +Approachable and helpful lecturers
- +Enriching international opportunities and campus life
Nothing to show
- -Excessive workloads and limited study spaces.
- -Poor teaching quality and unhelpful staff.
- -Stressful, high-stakes assessment methods.
- -Intense pressure and negative mental health impact.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
- -Communication issues and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -They express frustration with outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Unfair grading and unsupportive instructors.
- -Poor educational quality and high student attrition.
- -Restrictive international student policies and rising tuition fees are unwelcome.
- -Endless administrative red tape and complicated procedures cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent scores across several aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.32). Value for money also received a high mark (4.29). Conversely, the weakest area appears to be Accommodation (3.61), though Facilities (4) and Student Life (3.90) remain solid. Professors' ratings (3.87) are also respectable.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.44. Other well-regarded aspects include **Value** (4.28) and **Location** (4.13). The area with the lowest score is **Internationality**, rated at 3.88. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all solid, clustering around 4.06.
Boasting exceptional scores, the institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect 5/5 ratings. **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate strong performance with scores above 4.6. Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest ratings at 3.67 and 3.33 respectively. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, particularly in its physical environment and academic/global engagement.
With an impressive overall profile, this institution excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring 4.5. Students also appreciate the robust **Facilities** (4.29) and engaging **Student Life** (4.24). The **Accomodation** received the lowest score (4.07), indicating an area for potential improvement, though all other categories maintain strong to excellent ratings.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its facilities, achieving a remarkable 4.64. Student life and value also stand out, both scoring above 4.2. Internationality and accommodation are similarly well-regarded. The university's weakest area, comparatively, is its location, rated at 3.94. Professor quality is also solid, at 4.27.
Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in **Location**, receiving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **Student Life** also score highly, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker points, with scores of approximately 3.9 and 3.8 respectively. Ratings for **Professors** and **Value** are solid, sitting at around 4.16 and 4.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise the rigorous, intellectually enriching academic experience and strong international atmosphere. Limited negative feedback (~5.1%) highlights workload intensity and administrative complexity.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (around 97%), with students praising scenario-based teaching, hands-on work, and knowledgeable lecturers. A small amount of negative feedback mentions high pressure and mental health concerns.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the well-structured, interactive curriculum, expert faculty, and strong industry connections. Some wish for more career focus for MBA students.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews highlight practical, project-based learning and accessible lecturers. ~98% of feedback is positive, with just one negative review mentioning unfair grading.
With a 4.42 average rating from 33 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, highlighting enriching international experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A single negative review (~3%) cited restrictive Belgian policies and rising tuition.
With 42 positive reviews out of 48, students highly praise dynamic and practical courses, helpful lecturers, and valuable real-life skills. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
KU Leuven provides a rigorous academic experience with a strong international atmosphere. The programs are demanding but intellectually enriching, encouraging independent study. While administrative processes can be complex, the overall environment supports growth for motivated and self-driven students.
The course was expertly presented and covered practical, relevant, and up-to-date content that gives you a cutting-edge understanding of cross-border company affairs. In addition, I got the opportunity to meet new professionals from other countries.
Nothing to show
I’ve just finished my degree in International Tourism & Leisure at Thomas More, and honestly, it’s been an amazing experience. The program gave me a solid understanding of the tourism and hospitality industry and helped me develop both practical and theoretical skills. What I loved most was the international approach and the hands-on projects with real companies, which really prepared me for the professional world. The professors were always supportive and passionate about what they teach, which made a huge difference. On top of that, I met incredible people from all over the world and made friends for life, which made the experience even more special. Thanks to this degree, I’ve gained not only knowledge but also great opportunities to grow and start my career in tourism. Definitely recommend it to anyone interested in this field!
As someone who is about to graduate I look back on my time at UCLL and feel very grateful! The studies challenge us in different ways, the professors are known for their impressive careers before they started lecturing and the international experience is eye-opening. I would recommend the international business management and marketing course if you're open to meet new people and grow in more ways that just learning about business.
I like how you can directly talk to teachers without feeling like there's this hierarchy. I dislike how unorganised things can be such as: poor communication, poor planning: last minute timing etc.... Having a decent study track coach really helps with everything, because this is the individual that knows a lot about your study progress and who you are normally the most in contact with. Which in my case helped me a lot with all types of processes. Such as: admin work, advice on academic goals, future goals related to academia etc... The negative point for Artevelde would also be that they do not provide any parking for students. Therefore, students have to pay a hefty amount to park their car on the street(s) near campus. Meanwhile other universities/hogeschool in Ghent do provide plenty of this. I'd call it absolute greed because they are more than able to provide, instead they like to hoard the parking spaces. For the language courses, there should be more options than the ones they offer, because the major I'm in (international organisation and management) is full of international students and not everyone wants to study: French, Dutch, Spanish or German.... there should be more options... The other issue in my opinion would be that Artevelde is a "Applied Sciences school" which means, if you want to obtain a master degree afterwards, you can't just directly study one, when you're in Belgium or most of the neighbouring countries, you'd have to do a bridging year (a prep year).
Nothing to show
