SKEMA Business School vs Simon Business School vs University of Rochester vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs St. John Fisher College
Side-by-side comparison from 259 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and friendly student community and social opportunities
- +Ample student resources and support systems
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
- +High-quality educational programs
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
- +Supportive, engaging professors and a strong sense of community.
- +Diverse international environment and opportunities for global connections.
- +Rewarding, fulfilling experience with career launching potential and unique learning opportunities.
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest suit at 4.56. **Student Life** and **Professors** also receive high praise, both scoring 3.89. **Value** is another strong point, rated at 4.11. In contrast, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.89. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately well, at 3.78.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated category. Student life and internationality are also highly regarded, reflecting a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. Accommodations received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities, professors, and value all maintain solid, positive scores, suggesting a well-rounded educational experience.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
Nothing to show
With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of reviews are positive, praising professors' knowledge, research evidence, diverse student body, and campus resources. A small amount of feedback noted issues with uncommunicative advisors.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.
All 65 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.51/5. Recurring themes include a strong sense of community, supportive and engaging professors, and a valuable international environment.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I can say I am completely different from before and after AAU. At some point I wondered but now without even noticing I can see my knowledge has improved a lot. I say seamless because it is not the traditional type of learning, you learn through hands on projects, in class discussions, real world scenarios, interactive sessions and becomes part of your day to day life and interests. I 100% Recommend AAU to anyone who wants to experience a life-long a real international community and learn in the process while having the time of your life in Europe!
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
