SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs The New School vs California Polytechnic State University- Cal Poly vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 171 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Personalized, adaptable programs and learning
- +Supportive, engaging faculty and staff
- +Vibrant city environment with opportunities
- +Engaging and valuable education with practical application
- +Supportive faculty and enriching campus life with diverse activities
- +Beautiful and conducive environment for learning and personal growth
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong job placement and career support
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and networking opportunities are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. **Professors** are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately, while **Value** sits in a similar range.
An impressive and consistent performance is evident across all evaluated aspects. This institution excels in every area, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no apparent weak areas, with the university demonstrating exceptional strength across the board.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting fulfilling academic experiences and strong communities. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.
All three reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight pragmatic and valuable education, enjoyable campus life with opportunities for social engagement, and a great learning environment.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
Nothing to show
