SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Lehigh University vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 305 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Dedicated professors and academic rigor
- +Supportive environment for integration and collaboration
- +Vibrant student life and modern facilities
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +Supportive professors and hands-on learning experiences
- +Vibrant social life and strong sense of community
- +Rigorous academics with strong business and engineering programs
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Affordable, flexible, and self-paced online learning
- +Practical, real-world skills for career advancement
- +Supportive community and accessible advisors
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Poor educational outcomes and value for money.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Policy changes after enrollment frustrate students.
- -Course progression and pacing did not meet advertised expectations.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
Generally speaking, this university garners solid ratings across multiple facets. Professors and Facilities stand out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. Student Life and Accommodations represent areas for potential improvement, with ratings around 4.1. Location, Internationality, and Value also receive favorable marks, generally within the 4.2-4.3 range.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university receives strong ratings, particularly excelling in the quality of its professors, scoring a 4.5. Facilities and value are also highly rated at 4.33. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both receiving 3.67. Student life and internationality are rated solidly at 4 and 4.17 respectively.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
Exceptional strengths are evident in the university's professors, location, and student life, all receiving ratings above 4.66. Facilities and internationality are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodations present the weakest area, with a score of 3.55, while value sits slightly higher at 4.55.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 121 reviews, ~99% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, supportive professors, and a collaborative environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great academic and social experiences, supportive professors, and strong programs like engineering and business. A small amount of feedback mentions dated classrooms.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
With a 4.61 average rating from 18 reviews, ~89% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise flexibility, affordability, and practical skills, though ~6% mention policy changes causing disappointment.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
My experience with Nexford was nothing short of amazing! The curriculum was exactly what it should be, and I got real value for my money. I learned so much—things I never even knew existed, yet they turned out to be the key to success for me and many other students I know . It was a truly eye-opening journey that made me realize how little I actually knew before Nexford. I’ve been through a traditional university, graduated with distinction, yet when I compare my learning experiences, I can honestly say I didn’t learn much back then. It was after Nexford that my confidence truly grew. Now, when I speak, people acknowledge the depth of my knowledge and intelligence. Nexford doesn’t just teach you; it pushes you to grow. One of the best parts is when you finally start understanding project requirements, quizzes, and community discussions. It’s a whole new level of learning that builds your leadership skills and teaches you how to win—because at the end of the day, success depends on you. Nexford is a game-changer! This is my honest review, straight from the heart.
