Victor Babes University Of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMFT vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs West University from Timisoara - WUT vs Polytechnic University of Timisoara vs Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism
Side-by-side comparison from 123 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and engaging programs
- +Practical application through hospital internships and real anatomy
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and infrastructure
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum balancing theory and practical application
- +Excellent career opportunities and professional development
- +Supportive and accessible professors and peer support
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse activities
- +Effective learning and strong academic programs
- +Practical, modern, and applied teaching with knowledgeable and supportive instructors
- +Strong focus on skill development and real-world opportunities like internships and practice
- +Vibrant student life with diverse organizations, events, and a positive campus atmosphere
- +Accessible and friendly community
- +Supportive and relatable instructors
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
- -Poor quality of education and unprofessional faculty.
- -Ineffective translation and communication issues for foreign students.
- -Rushed and unsatisfactory practical learning experiences.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student-centered focus and administrative neglect.
- -Poor value for money with a perception of a profit-driven institution.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and unsupportive faculty are common complaints.
- -Outdated curriculum and unengaging professors.
- -Bureaucratic administrative processes are frustrating.
- -Poor quality of facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect between faculty and students are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
This university garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.44) and **Professors** (4.27), indicating excellent placement and academic staff. Student life also receives a solid rating (4.16). Conversely, **Internationality** (3.33) and **Value** (3.47) emerge as areas with the lowest scores, suggesting potential for improvement in global reach and affordability perception. Facilities and accommodation fall within the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.61, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.38. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3.78. Other assessed aspects like Professors (3.88), Accomodation (4.07), Value (4.04), and Internationality (3.79) fall within a moderate to good range.
This university achieves excellent marks in several key areas, particularly **Location** (4.675) and **Student Life** (4.45). Professors also received high praise. Conversely, **Accomodation** scored lowest (3.625), indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities and value for money fall within the mid-range of ratings.
This institution shines brightest in **Location**, boasting an impressive score. **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive strong marks. Conversely, **Internationality** is its weakest area, registering a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a mid-range of scores.
This institution shines particularly brightly in Student Life and Location, both receiving near-perfect scores. Accomodation also scores very highly. Conversely, Facilities and Professors are areas with the most room for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings among the surveyed aspects. Internationality and Value fall within the middle range.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, practical programs, and campus facilities. Negative feedback (~28.6%) mentions unprofessionalism and issues with course material translation.
Approximately 74% of 95 reviews are positive, citing structured curricula, knowledgeable professors, and good professional opportunities. A small portion (around 2%) expressed concerns about outdated facilities and perceived institutional priorities.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights a pleasant and welcoming environment, supportive teachers, and engaging student activities. Some minor organizational issues were noted, but overall, students feel they learn effectively.
Around 90% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, good educational opportunities, and engaged teachers. A small portion, about 10%, mentions outdated topics and bureaucratic processes.
This university receives a positive rating of 4/5. The lone review highlights friendly people and helpful teachers, with a particular mention of the engaging atmosphere and extracurriculars.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
Last year I chose ASE with a pinch of salt, because many of my acquaintances told me from their experience that it is a university where neither the teachers, nor the students are involved in their work. That couldn't be farther from the truth, at least for the German Business Administration faculty where I study. The students here are, though sometimes lazy, really creative and with a desire to put into practice the information that they get from the courses. The professors are really great at sharing their beliefs about different topics and they also put the student in some mind-blowing scenarios, where they really have to activate their brains to come up with a sensible answer. I remember with pleasure how we did unique role-play games during macroeconomics classes, games which made me come to a better understanding of how the market works. I also had quite an annoying experience that I'm going to share with you. It's about the marketing teacher whose courses I attended during the second semester. This person contradicted himself a lot of times and that made him look like he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. In addition to this, he used to mock the students who answered incorrectly to his questions, without even providing himself the right answer in the end. All in all, the entire collective of both students and teachers is welcoming and here at ASE can truly be achieved long-lasting friendships. It's an underrated faculty that I definitely recommend to all the people that are interested in studying smartly.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
