Victor Babes University Of Medicine and Pharmacy - UMFT vs University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs West University from Timisoara - WUT vs Romanian-American University
Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and engaging programs
- +Practical application through hospital internships and real anatomy
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and infrastructure
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Well-structured curriculum balancing theory and practical application
- +Excellent career opportunities and professional development
- +Supportive and accessible professors and peer support
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse activities
- +Effective learning and strong academic programs
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
- +Practical, modern, and applied teaching with knowledgeable and supportive instructors
- +Strong focus on skill development and real-world opportunities like internships and practice
- +Vibrant student life with diverse organizations, events, and a positive campus atmosphere
- +Accessible and friendly community
- +Supportive and relatable instructors
- -Poor quality of education and unprofessional faculty.
- -Ineffective translation and communication issues for foreign students.
- -Rushed and unsatisfactory practical learning experiences.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student-centered focus and administrative neglect.
- -Poor value for money with a perception of a profit-driven institution.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and unsupportive faculty are common complaints.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
- -Outdated curriculum and unengaging professors.
- -Bureaucratic administrative processes are frustrating.
- -Poor quality of facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect between faculty and students are common complaints.
This university garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.44) and **Professors** (4.27), indicating excellent placement and academic staff. Student life also receives a solid rating (4.16). Conversely, **Internationality** (3.33) and **Value** (3.47) emerge as areas with the lowest scores, suggesting potential for improvement in global reach and affordability perception. Facilities and accommodation fall within the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.61, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.38. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3.78. Other assessed aspects like Professors (3.88), Accomodation (4.07), Value (4.04), and Internationality (3.79) fall within a moderate to good range.
This university achieves excellent marks in several key areas, particularly **Location** (4.675) and **Student Life** (4.45). Professors also received high praise. Conversely, **Accomodation** scored lowest (3.625), indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities and value for money fall within the mid-range of ratings.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution shines brightest in **Location**, boasting an impressive score. **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive strong marks. Conversely, **Internationality** is its weakest area, registering a significantly lower rating. **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a mid-range of scores.
This institution shines particularly brightly in Student Life and Location, both receiving near-perfect scores. Accomodation also scores very highly. Conversely, Facilities and Professors are areas with the most room for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings among the surveyed aspects. Internationality and Value fall within the middle range.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good professors, practical programs, and campus facilities. Negative feedback (~28.6%) mentions unprofessionalism and issues with course material translation.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Approximately 74% of 95 reviews are positive, citing structured curricula, knowledgeable professors, and good professional opportunities. A small portion (around 2%) expressed concerns about outdated facilities and perceived institutional priorities.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights a pleasant and welcoming environment, supportive teachers, and engaging student activities. Some minor organizational issues were noted, but overall, students feel they learn effectively.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Around 90% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, good educational opportunities, and engaged teachers. A small portion, about 10%, mentions outdated topics and bureaucratic processes.
This university receives a positive rating of 4/5. The lone review highlights friendly people and helpful teachers, with a particular mention of the engaging atmosphere and extracurriculars.
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Last year I chose ASE with a pinch of salt, because many of my acquaintances told me from their experience that it is a university where neither the teachers, nor the students are involved in their work. That couldn't be farther from the truth, at least for the German Business Administration faculty where I study. The students here are, though sometimes lazy, really creative and with a desire to put into practice the information that they get from the courses. The professors are really great at sharing their beliefs about different topics and they also put the student in some mind-blowing scenarios, where they really have to activate their brains to come up with a sensible answer. I remember with pleasure how we did unique role-play games during macroeconomics classes, games which made me come to a better understanding of how the market works. I also had quite an annoying experience that I'm going to share with you. It's about the marketing teacher whose courses I attended during the second semester. This person contradicted himself a lot of times and that made him look like he doesn't have a clue what he is talking about. In addition to this, he used to mock the students who answered incorrectly to his questions, without even providing himself the right answer in the end. All in all, the entire collective of both students and teachers is welcoming and here at ASE can truly be achieved long-lasting friendships. It's an underrated faculty that I definitely recommend to all the people that are interested in studying smartly.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
