EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 462 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, case-based learning with contemporary HR and sustainability focus
- +Strong international community and networking opportunities
- +Engaging teaching from industry professionals and well-structured courses
- +Practical, real-world business education
- +Diverse, international student community
- +Opportunities for networking and career development
- +Knowledgeable and engaged professors
- +Diverse international student community
- +Well-structured assignments and accessible digital tools
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Diverse academic and extracurricular opportunities
- +Exceptional faculty and modern facilities
- +Welcoming and supportive campus atmosphere
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Program content and delivery do not meet expectations.
- -Grading is perceived as arbitrary.
- -Disorganization and administrative issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality, staff helpfulness, and facilities are subpar.
- -The institution prioritizes profit over genuine educational support and accreditation.
- -Poor program quality and low educational standards.
- -Ineffective administration and lack of student support.
- -Disorganized operations and failure to meet promised internship assistance.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources create significant difficulties.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
This institution receives excellent marks across several areas. Its **location** is its strongest asset, followed closely by its **internationality**. **Student life**, **facilities**, and **professors** are also highly rated. The university's **value** for money is also a positive point. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **accommodation**.
This university shows particularly strong performance in its location and internationality, both receiving high scores. Student life and facilities also stand out positively. However, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other aspects. The value and professor ratings fall in the mid-range, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these categories.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a high score of 4.54. **Professors** and **Location** also received strong ratings, both above 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.95. **Facilities** and **Student Life** received moderate scores, around 3.5. The **Value** rating sits at a respectable 3.88.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with Student Life and Professors standing out as its strongest points. Location and Accommodations also receive positive feedback. However, Internationality presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower rating compared to other aspects. The university offers a generally positive experience, with facilities and value ratings falling in the mid-range.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
The vast majority of reviews (98%) are positive, highlighting modern methodologies, practical case-based learning, and networking opportunities. A small percentage of negative feedback (2%) mentioned issues with course scheduling and administration.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and networking. Approximately 8% are negative, citing disorganization, basic education, and unhelpful staff.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors and a diverse, engaging learning environment. A small portion of feedback (~10.7%) raises concerns about program utility and organizational support.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With an average rating of 4.54/5 from 41 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive. Recurring themes include a wide range of academic opportunities and student groups, as well as a stunning campus with accessible resources.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
My program here has many outstanding aspects, but one that stands out is the quality of the faculty. They are not only experienced professionals but also active researchers. Their expertise and insights make the program even stronger, especially because they are thorough and ensure each student grasps the material.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Nothing to show
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
