Cracow University of Economics - CUE vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Lazarski University vs Silesian University of Technology - SUT vs Kozminski University
Side-by-side comparison from 347 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse learning opportunities and academic prospects
- +Supportive and engaging campus culture with helpful instructors
- +Strong degree opening career doors
- +Well-organized university with responsive administration
- +Inspiring learning environment with quality education and practical experience
- +Welcoming international community and enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Modern, well-equipped labs for hands-on learning
- +Strong industry ties and career opportunities
- +Supportive environment for student development and research
- +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
- +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
- +Welcoming and supportive academic environment with approachable and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse and international student body with accessible English-taught programs.
- +Practical learning opportunities and personalized attention in engaging discussions.
- +Supportive and accessible professors and staff.
- +Small class sizes and individual attention.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently surface as a point of dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content not suitable for English Philology graduates.
- -Lack of promised opportunities beyond specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded and inadequate facilities.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of effective communication and student support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of practical application and career support
- -Inconsistent curriculum and poor lecturer English proficiency hinder learning.
- -Difficulty in receiving promised refunds and poor communication from administration.
- -Lack of preparation for future careers due to teaching methods.
- -Ineffective administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of clarity on important information are recurring problems.
This institution excels in areas like Student Life and Facilities, both receiving high marks. Location and Internationality are also strong points. However, Accomodation appears to be its weakest area, scoring notably lower than other categories. The university also receives solid ratings for its Professors and Value.
Evaluations reveal a university with notable strengths in location, boasting a score of 4.81, and in its professors, earning a 4.47. Student life and value are also highly regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.99, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Facilities and internationality also received solid, above-average scores.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
Across several key metrics, this institution garners positive feedback. Its strongest areas are Location, with a rating of 4.33, and Student Life, scoring 4.29. Professors also received a commendable rating of 4.21. The weakest area identified is Internationality, which received a score of 3.92, with Facilities and Accomodation rated at 4.0. Value is also rated at a solid 4.
Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.
The university garners solid marks across most areas, with Location standing out as a significant strength. Internationality and Professors also received favorable reviews. Conversely, Accomodation was rated the weakest, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores.
This institution achieves exceptional scores, particularly in **Professors**, **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect marks. Areas like **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. No significant weaknesses are identified in this rating set, indicating a well-rounded and highly regarded academic environment.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 51 reviews, ~92% are positive, highlighting valuable academic opportunities, supportive staff, and a positive university culture. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned negative experiences with university staff.
The university receives strong positive feedback (~86%) regarding inspiring people, good organization, and enjoyable student life. A small percentage of reviews (~3.9%) mention program course design issues and underfunded facilities.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
With an average rating of 4.35/5, roughly 99% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern lab facilities, strong industry links, and hands-on learning opportunities like Project Based Learning. Administration navigation is a minor frustration for some.
Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable lecturers, a welcoming and diverse environment, and good learning standards. A smaller portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with curriculum adherence, financial transparency, and lecturer communication.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for professors' dedication and helpful staff, fostering individualized attention in small groups. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Nothing to show
Studies, are at very good level, but the most important think is what university gives you apart from lectures. There are so many free courser, and student organisactions you can join. Ya'll never get bored here.
Nothing to show
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
