Université de Bourgogne - UB vs SKEMA Business School vs Burgundy School of Business vs Excelia Business School vs School of Wine & Spirits Business
Side-by-side comparison from 209 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging faculty and practical, skill-building programs
- +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
- +Smooth application and onboarding process
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Engaging and high-quality programs with experienced professors.
- +Convenient and pleasant location with good infrastructure.
- +International diversity and friendly atmosphere.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
Nothing to show
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder educational experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Inadequate return on investment for the high tuition fees.
- -Poor organizational structure hinders professors.
- -Insufficient career services and limited networking opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Academic and student experience factors generally received positive feedback, with Student Life standing out as the strongest area. Facilities and Internationality also garnered high scores. The university's Location was rated as the weakest aspect among the surveyed categories, though still within a respectable range. Overall, the institution demonstrates a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in student engagement and international appeal.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
Academic and student experiences at this institution are generally well-regarded, with the location standing out as a particular strength. Professors and student life also received very positive feedback. However, areas such as facilities and accommodation represent opportunities for improvement, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Internationality and value for money fall within the mid-range of assessments.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
Nothing to show
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
Nothing to show
The Université de Bourgogne receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~88% of 33 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight esteemed faculty, practical learning, and an inclusive campus environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising location, program quality, and experiential learning. ~13% are negative, citing cost-effectiveness and facility issues. The average rating is 3.63/5.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
Nothing to show
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
Nothing to show
