Instituto Químico de Sarriá - IQS vs EADA Business School vs GBSB Global Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 258 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical work and supportive staff
- +Rewarding connections and tranquil atmosphere
- +Convenient location and nice facilities
- +Strong focus on soft skills development
- +Practical business application and real-world experience
- +International environment and global career readiness
- +Engaged and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and high-quality student community
- +Well-structured learning and supportive environment
- +Supportive faculty and staff
- +Modern facilities and resources
- +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
- +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
- +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Unhelpful or inaccessible staff and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance of buildings.
- -Limited career support and irrelevant course content.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Discrepancies between advertised program focus and actual content, particularly regarding sustainability.
- -Inconsistent or arbitrary grading and assessment methods.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor organization and lack of support.
- -Low educational level and irrelevant degree programs.
- -Inadequate facilities and unfulfilled internship promises.
- -Poor management and unqualified staff.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
An overall assessment reveals the university excels in its facilities, earning a high 4.5-star rating. Student life and accommodation also score well at 4.33. The weakest area, however, is the professors, with a rating of 3.67. Location, internationality, and value all received solid 4-star ratings, indicating a generally positive but not perfect student experience.
The university receives particularly strong marks for its **Location**, with an impressive rating. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are also highly regarded. The university's weakest area, though still solid, is **Accomodation**. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded offering with notable strengths in its surroundings and campus experience.
Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The university excels in **Internationality** and **Location**, boasting the highest scores. **Professors** also receive strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the clear weakest area, significantly underperforming compared to other categories. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall in the mid-range, while **Value** presents a solid, above-average rating.
This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
With a 3.33 average rating, reviews are largely positive, highlighting practical work, friendly staff, and good facilities. No negative feedback was reported.
Nearly all 158 reviews are positive, praising soft skills development, practical applications, and international environments. A small minority of feedback (around 2.5%) mentioned administrative issues and inconsistent program focus.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and engaged lecturers, a diverse community, and well-structured assignments. A small percentage (around 10%) express dissatisfaction with program usefulness and administrative support.
Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
Nothing to show
International Immersion: Transformative Leadership for Future Challenges – Program Review I had the opportunity to participate in the International Immersion program at EADA Business School, Barcelona, spending a month at the Barcelona campus and an additional week at the Collbató campus. The overall experience was highly enriching and impactful. The classroom sessions at the Barcelona campus were exceptionally interactive and engaging. The learning environment encouraged open dialogue, collaborative thinking, and the exchange of diverse perspectives among participants from different backgrounds. This significantly enhanced the depth of discussions and contributed to a well-rounded learning experience. The Collbató campus offered a distinctly immersive environment, combining experiential learning with outdoor activities. This setting complemented the academic sessions by fostering teamwork, reflection, and leadership development in a more informal yet highly effective context. Overall, the program was a valuable learning journey. While the immediate experience was positive, its true impact has become more evident over time. It has contributed meaningfully to my personal and professional development, particularly in enhancing my leadership perspective, cross-cultural understanding, and ability to navigate complex, real-world challenges.
My program here has many outstanding aspects, but one that stands out is the quality of the faculty. They are not only experienced professionals but also active researchers. Their expertise and insights make the program even stronger, especially because they are thorough and ensure each student grasps the material.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
