New York University - NYU vs Hochschule Fresenius vs ISG International Business School vs The New School vs Fashion Institute of Technology - FIT
Side-by-side comparison from 145 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Personalized, adaptable programs and learning
- +Supportive, engaging faculty and staff
- +Vibrant city environment with opportunities
- +Fosters creativity, uniqueness, and innovation.
- +Strong industry-focused programs and learning opportunities.
- +Encourages academic exploration and diverse experiences.
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and networking opportunities are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of communication and transparency leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution scores exceptionally well in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. **Professors** are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. **Student Life** and **Facilities** are rated moderately, while **Value** sits in a similar range.
This university receives excellent marks for its Internationality, scoring a high 4.67. Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value are also highly regarded, all achieving a commendable 4.33. Accommodation is rated a respectable 3.67, while Facilities represent the weakest area with a score of 3.33.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4/5 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting fulfilling academic experiences and strong communities. Negative feedback is minimal, with no 1-2 star reviews.
With 3 reviews averaging 4/5 stars, students praise diversity and creativity, with ~100% positive feedback. One review mentioned a competitive atmosphere and unfriendly students, while praising helpful professors.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
Nothing to show
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
