SKEMA Business School vs Université de Bretagne Occidentale - UBO vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs TELECOM Bretagne vs National Institute of Advanced Technologies of Brittany - ENSTA Bretagne
Side-by-side comparison from 178 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Supportive and dedicated staff and teachers
- +High quality faculty and academic level
- +Excellent library resources
- +Strong French language support
- +Rigorous academic programs
Nothing to show
- +High academic level, diverse specializations, and preparation for industry.
- +Opportunities for personal development across multiple fields.
- +Engaging campus life and exciting student activities.
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
- -Lack of student support and resources is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is a problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Professors (5/5). Facilities and Student Life are also highly rated at 4.5. Its Location and Value also receive a strong 4.5. Accommodations stand out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, while Internationality scores a solid 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, **Location** and **Accommodation** represent the areas with the lowest ratings, scoring a 3. The university also performs well in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, each earning a solid 4.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise supportive staff and faculty, with a mention of a good library.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is highly praised. Students value the high academic level, competent teachers, and diverse course offerings enabling career readiness. Campus life is also described as exciting.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
