SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS vs Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre - UFCSPA vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS
Side-by-side comparison from 191 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Excellent teaching quality and demanding preparation for the job market.
- +Inspiring and supportive professors with high academic standards.
- +Top-notch research and outstanding facilities/labs.
- +Qualified and enthusiastic professors
- +Well-maintained, comfortable, and spacious campus facilities
- +Strong academic programs and career preparation
- +Excellent infrastructure and qualified professionals/teachers
- +Strong research opportunities and advanced learning environment
- +High-quality education and professional development through hospital complex
- +Experienced professors with practical application
- +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
- +Quality education meeting student expectations
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unclear course structures lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and technology
- -Lack of practical application and career preparation
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its value proposition and location, both receiving high marks. Student life and internationality also score well, indicating a positive and globally engaged campus environment. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities and professors are rated solidly in the mid-range.
This institution garners exceptional scores in its physical environment and placement. Facilities and Location both received outstanding ratings of 4.875. Professors were also highly regarded at 4.5, contributing to a strong academic perception. Student Life and Value also presented positively. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 3.29, alongside Internationality at 3.63.
Overall, this university receives positive evaluations across several key areas. Its strongest aspects are **Value** (4.76) and **Location** (4.47), indicating excellent return on investment and a desirable setting. **Facilities** (4.39) and **Professors** (4.22) also score well. The areas with the lowest ratings are **Accomodation** (3.63) and **Internationality** (3.59), suggesting opportunities for improvement in these domains.
This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
Students highly praise the university's demanding yet effective preparation for the job market, excellent professors, and strong research. The campus and facilities are noted as magnificent and beautiful. Negative feedback is minimal.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students praise qualified professors, comfortable campus facilities, and a strong community. No negative feedback was provided.
All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.67/5. Students highlight well-trained professionals and excellent infrastructure, with approximately 100% satisfaction.
Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am an international student at UFCSPA and I will be graduating next summer. Over the past 6 years that I've been in this institution, I have learned more than just medicine. I am a true believer that doctor and medical education need to be revolutionized. In my school, I found that we need to stop thinking about medicine as a business and rather as a right for all beings. That education needs to be made for the people first and not necessarily for the industry and that doctors serve these people, our community. I have the privilege to study in a unique public university with a prestigious past, With an envisioned future and with a great endeavor to move forward. An incredible campus, a humane staff and where science meets humanity. I must say that although we did have struggles (and we do all) I don't regret anything and encourage others to pursue their dreams here #GoBrazil #PublicEducation #EducationForAll #OpenAccess #EduOpinions
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
