SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 189 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Strong preparation for the job market and career readiness
- +Excellent facilities and a welcoming academic environment
- +Experienced professors with practical application
- +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
- +Quality education meeting student expectations
- +Highly qualified and supportive professors
- +Robust infrastructure and well-equipped facilities
- +Diverse opportunities for practical experience and professional growth
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Emphasis on practical, real-world content
- +Qualified professors and strong teaching methods
- +Superior facilities and classroom structure
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and effective teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor course organization detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
This institution receives its highest marks for Value, with an impressive score. Location also stands out as a significant strength. Areas requiring the most improvement are Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated similarly well, while Student Life falls in the middle range.
This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.
Academic offerings and the campus environment are highly praised, with exceptional scores for Professors (4.83) and Location (4.83). Student Life (4.5) and Internationality (4.67) also received strong marks. Facilities are rated well at 4.33. The weakest areas identified are Accomodation (3.67). Notably, the university achieves a perfect score of 5 for Value.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
Outstanding scores mark this institution's facilities, professors, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect five. Student life and internationality are also solid, earning four points each. The university's weakest area, however, is its value for money, which scored three. The location is rated positively at four.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With an average rating of 4.56/5, nearly all (~100%) of the 9 reviews are positive, praising excellent teaching quality, dedicated professors, and strong preparation for the job market. A slight suggestion for more professional education was mentioned.
Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.
With 100% positive feedback, students praise highly qualified professors and extensive research/fieldwork opportunities. The university's infrastructure and support services are also frequently highlighted.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
This university receives predominantly positive feedback (~100% positive sentiment) with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight strong practical content for healthcare fields and qualified professors, valuing the teaching methodology.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
