SKEMA Business School vs University of the Western Cape - UWC vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT vs Milpark Education
Side-by-side comparison from 708 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Supportive and helpful staff/lecturers
- +Strong academic programs and career preparation
- +Diverse and inclusive campus environment
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse and practical programmes
- +Welcoming and accommodating environment
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Administrative and financial system issues cause student stress.
- -Lack of empathy and support from departments is discouraging.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Accommodation and administrative issues are frequent problems.
- -The university's system is perceived as slow.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
Regarding university ratings, value emerges as the strongest aspect, closely followed by professors. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with location also receiving a less favorable score. Student life and internationality are rated solidly, while facilities fall in the mid-range.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with particular strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.53. **Facilities** also received a very positive assessment at 4.42. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a score of 3.79. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value fall within a generally favorable range, indicating a well-rounded but not exceptional experience in those aspects.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
With a 4.19 average rating from 67 reviews, ~79% of feedback is positive. Students praise strong academic programs and supportive faculty, particularly in EMS and Accounting. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) highlights challenges with financial aid systems and student support.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
With an average rating of 4.33 out of 5 from 21 reviews, ~85% of students praised the diverse programs, supportive lecturers, and engaging classes. A small minority (~5%) noted issues with registration, slow systems, and occasional accommodation protests.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
One thing I can say is the support services are very helpful. From class reps who stand on students behalf to communicate with lecturers to facilitators who do group sessions to prepare students for tests and exams and tutors who personally help students individually to clear uncertainties . Lecturers are welcome and willing to help students at all times. It's a great institution.
It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Whatever you do, do not enroll with this facility if you have already completed subject that is in another course that you want to enroll in. they do not give you the option to apply for recognition of prior learning, and the subject are of a lessor standard that what I have completed. they will waste your money, phone your next of kin regarding an account where they owe you money on. Their admin department is seriously in need of education and accounts department are already in possession of my account details to refund what I could manage to cancel without it costing me more that what they have taken due to them not answering emails either. I have also referred this to SAICA for review of their standards and ethics.
