SKEMA Business School vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education vs MANCOSA - MANCOSA
Side-by-side comparison from 1,075 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- +Supportive and friendly academic staff
- +Strong sense of community and unity
- +Vibrant campus social life
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
- -Outdated facilities and curriculum lacking modern technological advancements.
- -Poorly maintained residences with issues like cold showers and inadequate security.
- -Slow delivery of services and disconnect between foreign professors and local standards.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its **Value** rating, achieving a perfect score. **Professors** also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** was rated the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with some areas excelling and others slightly lagging.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
Approximately 64% of reviews highlight unity, friendly people, and vibrant campus life. However, about 21% of feedback points to issues with outdated materials and slow service delivery.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
Nothing to show
