SKEMA Business School vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs Cape Peninsula University of Technology - CPUT vs North-West University - NWU vs STADIO
Side-by-side comparison from 1,143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Supportive and experienced lecturers
- +Practical, hands-on learning
- +Welcoming faculty and smooth transitions
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers.
- +Practical learning experiences and diverse showcases.
- +Smooth and hassle-free administrative processes.
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Engaging and well-structured learning experiences
- +Supportive and friendly campus environment
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and poor communication.
- -Lack of sufficient resources, equipment, and accommodation is a significant problem.
- -Inconsistent lecturer dedication and unclear career prospects after graduation are concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Inadequate resources and support.
- -Poorly maintained facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and lack of student support.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the university is poor and dismissive of student concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
This university demonstrates a commendable performance across key areas, with particularly strong showings in its professors and value for money, both scoring 4.09. Student life and location also received favorable ratings, around 3.8. However, the university's weakest area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.1, and internationality, at 3.45, also presents an opportunity for improvement. Facilities, rated at 3.62, fall in the mid-range.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Value** and **Location**, both receiving excellent scores. The **Internationality** of the student body is also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also present opportunities for improvement, while **Professors** are well-regarded.
This university's student feedback indicates a strong performance in **Student Life** and **Value**, both scoring 4.2 and above. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received high marks, close to 4.0. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are areas for improvement, with lower scores. **Internationality** sits in the mid-range. Overall, the university excels in student experience and perceived worth, with physical campus aspects and housing needing attention.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, practical learning, and rewarding study experiences. A small percentage of feedback (~9%) mentions challenges with accommodation and administrative issues.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising lecturer support, practical experience, and a smooth administrative process. There is no negative feedback.
~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting personal growth, valuable learning experiences, and enjoyable campus life. A very small percentage of feedback (~3%) expresses frustration with administrative responsiveness.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
The e-learning center being open 24/7 really help me when wi-fi was inaccessible in my residents. This really help me to work in a quiet environment that's filled with like minded students. Highly recommend this institution!
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
I attended Stadio with hesitance - I had really been hoping to attend a more mainstream university like WITS or UJ - but I got all that and more with Stadio. The lecturers are the best, nothing compares to their intellect and interest in their respective fields. There are, admittedly, certain issues with admin (it may be an uncommon issue) But, like I said - excellent lecturers, great quality content to learn, and simply an overall enjoyable experience to be able to attend Stadio.
Walter Sisulu University is a rural university that offers accessibility to students from mostly underprivileged backgrounds. Some of its facilities and processes showed this. However, it is well known for its excellent medical programmes. My experience was mostly positve albeit with a few glitches here and there. Overall, I would recommend it as I myself am planning to go back for my Master's degree.
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
