SKEMA Business School vs Vaal University of Technology vs North-West University - NWU vs Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT vs Milpark Education

Side-by-side comparison from 632 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Regenesys Business School (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Vaal University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
North-West University - NWU: wins 0/7 categories
Central University of Technology, Free State - CUT: wins 0/7 categories
Milpark Education: wins 0/7 categories
Regenesys Business School: wins 7/7 categories
Eduvos - eduvos: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
4.30
Read more reviews
26 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Potchefstroom, South Africa
4.40
Read more reviews
415 reviews
×
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Information Technology
Cape Town, South Africa
2.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Johannesburg, South Africa
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Johannesburg, South Africa
3.70
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Arts and Humanities
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.04
4.27
4.42
1.25
4.60
Win
4.20
Location
4.24
4.13
4.11
4.53
3.00
4.80
Win
4.14
Professors
4.40
4.19
4.20
4.19
3.00
4.60
Win
3.87
Internationality
4.39
3.69
3.96
3.95
3.00
4.80
Win
3.80
Student life
4.14
4.04
4.21
4.22
1.25
4.25
Win
3.73
Value
4.05
4.12
4.38
4.14
3.00
4.60
Win
3.73
Accommodation
3.59
3.68
3.84
3.79
1.00
4.67
Win
3.29
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
  • +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
  • +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
  • +Practical experience and career preparation
  • +Accessible lecturers and good study facilities
  • +Affordable fees and accommodation
  • +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
  • +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
  • +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Diverse and practical programmes
  • +Welcoming and accommodating environment
  • +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
  • +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
  • +Well-structured and engaging course content.
  • +Innovative programs with modern technology and effective module structures
  • +Committed faculty with real-world insights and supportive administration
  • +Global and inclusive environment fostering personal development and leadership
  • +Small class sizes and lecturer support
  • +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
  • +Streamlined application process
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
  • -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
  • -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
  • -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
  • -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
  • -Accommodation and administrative issues are frequent problems.
  • -The university's system is perceived as slow.
  • -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
  • -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
  • -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
  • -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
  • -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.

A well-rounded academic experience is indicated by these university ratings. Professors received the highest marks at 4.19, closely followed by Location (4.125) and Value (4.115). Student Life and Facilities also scored well, both above 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation at 3.68 and Internationality at 3.69 represent the areas with the lowest scores.

This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.

Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with particular strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.53. **Facilities** also received a very positive assessment at 4.42. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a score of 3.79. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value fall within a generally favorable range, indicating a well-rounded but not exceptional experience in those aspects.

This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.

Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both achieving 4.8. **Accommodations** also received a very high rating of 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, **Student Life** registered the lowest score at 4.25, though it remains a solid rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high level of satisfaction across its facilities, professors, and value.

This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.

Students express strong satisfaction, with ~74% giving high ratings. Recurring positive themes include preparation for the work environment, accessible lecturers, and a positive campus experience. No negative feedback was recorded.

Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.

With an average rating of 4.33 out of 5 from 21 reviews, ~85% of students praised the diverse programs, supportive lecturers, and engaging classes. A small minority (~5%) noted issues with registration, slow systems, and occasional accommodation protests.

Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.

With an average rating of 4.6/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern technology, lecturer support, and engaging module structures. No negative feedback was reported.

About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
54%
49%
57%
25%
80%
13%
4★
42%
27%
39%
29%
25%
0%
53%
3★
6%
19%
11%
10%
0%
20%
27%
2★
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
5%
50%
0%
7%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Finishing my diploma on time with cum laude

It was a good institution but they didn’t take care of their students who were doing well in other institutions students who were doing were given the bursaries.i felt that the university didn’t take good care of their students

Amazing

NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .

I'm doing Environmental health science currently

It's actually a nice university, it has more opportunities and usually give their students experience that they are gonna need in their professional field. I like almost everything about it ,the events and activities provided to learners 😊. Our lectures are very friendly and real good when it comes to doing their job and they offer more study materials for learners to be able to understand their work.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Work load

Good but you have to be ready to take on a busy academic schedule, the four quarter system, means more work spaced out in smaller time frame as opposed to a traditional semester schedule. The hybrid learning model allows you to balance school and your personal life, whilst giving you the responsibility of managing your school work

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close