SKEMA Business School vs University of the People - UoPeople vs Massachusetts Institute of Technology - MIT vs Schiller International University vs General Assembly
Side-by-side comparison from 3,353 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Affordable, flexible online education
- +Diverse international learning community
- +Practical, career-advancing curriculum
- +World-class academics and practical learning experiences
- +Innovative environment fostering future-changing projects and global career prospects
- +Supportive community and personal growth through challenging workloads
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
- +Welcoming and friendly campus community
- +Opportunities for personal growth and new experiences
- +Engaging learning and enriching academic programs
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Outdated learning platforms and lack of community features frustrate students.
- -Unexpectedly high costs due to mandatory exam fees negate the "tuition-free" appeal.
- -Security concerns arose from a significant personal data breach.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is poor and feedback is ignored.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, especially in art buildings.
- -Lack of practical career preparation and too many general education courses.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
Internationality and Professors are exceptionally strong aspects, both scoring well over 4.5. Value also stands out with a rating close to 4.8. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, receiving the lowest score at under 3. Facilities and Location are moderately rated, while Student Life falls slightly above average.
Excelling in key areas, this university achieves its highest marks for Facilities (4.64) and Professors (4.59), with Value also scoring strongly at 4.59. Location is also well-regarded at 4.49. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both scoring above 4.1. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 4.02.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
A review of university ratings reveals strengths in core academic and social aspects. Professors and Student Life received particularly high scores, both exceeding 4.3. Facilities also performed well, scoring 4.31. Conversely, Location emerged as the lowest-rated category, with a score of 3.68. Accomodation and Value were also moderate, at 3.90 and 3.76 respectively.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
A vast majority (~99.6%) of reviews are positive, praising flexibility, affordability, and diverse community. A small fraction (~0.4%) mention navigation issues, data breaches, or exam fees.
With a 4.61 average rating from 46 reviews, ~98% are positive, highlighting exceptional learning experiences, demanding yet resilient-building workloads, and an inspiring, innovative environment. Some mention intense competition.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
Approximately 76% of reviews are positive, highlighting learning opportunities, networking, and a welcoming campus environment. A small portion of feedback, around 9.5%, expresses concerns about career-focused skills and specific facility issues.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I highly recommend this university to anyone looking for a high-quality, accessible education. The fully online, tuition-free model provides incredible flexibility, making it easy to balance assignments with daily life. What I love most is the vibrant, multicultural environment collaborating with peers from all over the world has completely broadened my perspective. It is a highly structured and supportive platform that keeps me disciplined and motivated.
MIT is a top college in the USA offering a multitude of technology based courses. The college exposes students to a variety of top companies, research institutes and other influential career prospects. This happens not just after the study period but also during the course of study. As such as soon as students graduate, they are already equipped with industry specific qualifications to compete and thrive on top earning jobs worldwide. One down side to MIT is the immense level of competition and demand academically from the programs, as such some students might spend much of their time studying and not focus on other enjoyable aspects of the university.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
