SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University vs Wingate University

Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Wingate University: wins 0/7 categories
Gaston College - gaston: wins 0/7 categories
Gardner-Webb university: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Life Sciences & Medicine, Business & Management
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best for: Arts & Humanities, Life Sciences & Medicine, Social Sciences
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Social Sciences, Business & Management
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best for: Life Sciences & Medicine, Social Sciences, Business & Management
North Carolina, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Natural Sciences & Mathematics, Business & Management
North Carolina, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Natural Sciences & Mathematics
North Carolina, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best for: Engineering & Technology, Life Sciences & Medicine, Business & Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
3.67
3.43
3.83
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.24
5.00
Win
4.64
4.92
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Professors
4.41
4.00
3.86
4.58
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.35
3.67
4.50
4.92
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Student life
4.10
3.33
4.07
4.08
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.03
4.00
3.64
4.17
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.56
3.00
2.50
3.67
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
  • +Supportive professors and positive learning environment
  • +Career development flexibility and pathways
  • +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible online learning and excellent instructors
  • +High-quality courses and valuable academic resources
  • +Affordable tuition and great overall value
Cons
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inflexible or unsupportive academic and course structures are also a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a consistent problem.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent course content are major frustrations.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and international student experience, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life, accommodation, and its location are also rated positively at 4. The overall value proposition is also excellent, mirrored by the 4.5 rating.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, and overall Value. Location and Internationality are also highly rated, receiving strong 4.5 scores. While there are no significantly weak areas, these two categories present the only slight opportunities for further enhancement in an otherwise outstanding assessment.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, students highlight career goal support, academic flexibility, and vibrant campus life. Professors are described as caring and invested in success, fostering a positive and supportive learning environment.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the convenience of online learning, high-quality courses, accessible instructors, and good value. The school clinic and library resources are also highlighted positively.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
33%
21%
67%
50%
0%
50%
4★
42%
67%
50%
25%
50%
0%
50%
3★
7%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Featured
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close