SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Fairfield University vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 167 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Southeastern Louisiana University (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/6 categories
Fairfield University: wins 0/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/6 categories
Sacred Heart University: wins 1/6 categories
Southeastern Louisiana University: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Fairfield, Connecticut, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Fairfield, Connecticut, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Hammond Louisiana, United States
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Science (Recreation and Sports Management)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
3.67
Not rated
3.43
3.83
4.50
4.60
Win
Location
4.24
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.64
4.92
3.50
4.20
Professors
4.41
4.00
Not rated
3.86
4.58
5.00
Win
4.80
Internationality
4.35
3.67
Not rated
4.50
4.92
Win
4.00
4.80
Student life
4.10
3.33
Not rated
4.07
4.08
4.50
4.50
Value
4.03
4.00
Not rated
3.64
4.17
4.50
4.60
Win
Accommodation
3.56
3.00
Not rated
2.50
3.67
4.50
4.60
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
  • +Strong global communications and international affairs programs
  • +Supportive and flexible online social work program
  • +Island location and proximity to Old San Juan
  • +Supportive professors and welcoming community
  • +Good academic programs and individual attention
  • +Affordable tuition and accessible resources
Cons
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of support and resources hinders learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
  • -Outdated technology and poor internet connectivity.
  • -Limited career services and job placement support.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

Overall, this university receives excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Professors (5)**, **Facilities (4.5)**, **Student Life (4.5)**, and **Accomodation (4.5)**. These areas suggest a supportive and well-resourced environment. The university also scores well in **Internationality (4)** and **Value (4.5)**. The weakest area is **Location**, receiving a 3.5 rating, indicating this may be a point of consideration.

This institution garners very positive feedback across the board. Its strongest areas are **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving an excellent 4.8. **Location** is the comparatively weakest point, though still rated highly at 4.2. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value are all consistently strong, averaging around 4.5-4.6, indicating a well-rounded and appealing university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Nothing to show

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, reviews highlight exceptional Global Communications and International Affairs programs. Students also praise strong support systems for online Master's programs.

Students highly praise the college, citing wonderful professors, excellent community, and numerous resources. The university is described as warm, welcoming, and family-like, with knowledgeable instructors and a beautiful campus.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
33%
0%
21%
67%
50%
60%
4★
42%
67%
0%
50%
25%
50%
40%
3★
7%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close