SKEMA Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs ISG International Business School vs Mills College vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 167 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
- +International experience and career support
- +Relevant and varied course content
- +Helpful and educated faculty
- +Supportive university staff
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
- +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
- +Practical experience and career advancement support
- +Engaging and enjoyable learning experience
- +Realistic projects and experienced tutors
- +Personalized and flexible learning options
- -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
- -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
- -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
- -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
- -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.
With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.
This institution demonstrates a varied performance across key metrics. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are identified as areas for improvement, with ratings of 3. The university also scores well in Internationality, indicating a globally engaged environment.
With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.
All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students found the lessons engaging and realistic, with experienced tutors and practical projects contributing to a positive learning experience.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
I liked how there was a quick questionnaire during onboarding to personalize my experience. In my case, I did the course to see if the subject matter was the right one for me, as I do not have a technical background. I could choose to study around my schedule or to follow a disciplined program, which is what I need sometimes to help with motivation levels. Maybe a short course on its own is not enough to start working in this field, but I enjoyed the process and hope to be able to work on some different projects at my current job in the future, or at the very least, communicate with our dev team a bit better.
