SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs North-West University - NWU vs Milpark Education vs Center for Creative Leadership
Side-by-side comparison from 584 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Excellent support services and helpful faculty
- +Vibrant and organized campus life with social activities
- +Beautiful campus environment conducive to study
- +Exceptional flexibility for working professionals.
- +Strong lecturer availability and support systems.
- +Well-structured and engaging course content.
- +Student-centered support and inclusivity
- +Welcoming and understanding community
- +Supportive lecturers and academic environment
- +Modern facilities and inclusive campus
- +Practical learning for career readiness
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of practical experience and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on targets over academics.
- -Language barriers making academic engagement difficult.
- -Administrative and communication issues create confusion and unnecessary costs.
- -The institution prioritizes financial gain over genuine student support and well-being.
- -Exam content and assessment procedures are misleading and unfair.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Value for money stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by excellent Facilities. Student Life and Professors also receive commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation presents the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, with Internationality also scoring moderately lower than the top-performing metrics.
This institution exhibits a notable disparity in its evaluated aspects. Its weakest areas, with scores of 1.25 and 1 respectively, are Facilities and Accomodation, suggesting significant room for improvement in these domains. Conversely, Location, Internationality, and Value are its strongest points, all receiving a solid rating of 3. Professors also perform moderately well at 3.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.
This institution demonstrates a strong academic environment, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.57. Facilities and location also score well, both at 4.33. Student life is rated positively at 4.29, and value for money is a notable strength at 4.43. Accommodation is rated at a solid 4.0. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.29.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 414 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive, highlighting beautiful campuses, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. Very minimal negative feedback exists.
Half of the university's reviews are negative, citing communication and application issues, as well as concerns about finances and perceived unfair grading. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and lecturer support, despite the high cost.
With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.
University reviews show strong satisfaction, with approximately 100% positive feedback. Students praise dedicated lecturers, modern facilities, and a supportive environment fostering personal and professional growth.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Their method of communication is clashing, it is not directed to specific people or departments. Academic events clash with classes, which makes it difficult for students to attend important events. Yes I would recommend it to only those who are good decision makers who can properly prioritise.
Nothing to show
