SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs University of Maryland University College - UMUC vs Schiller International University vs Hospitality Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs with practical, career-focused learning
- +Diverse, international student environment and collaborative experiences
- +Excellent professional opportunities and supportive career services
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and career preparation
- +Excellent faculty and industry-relevant curriculum
- +Positive social connections and campus environment
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- +Flexible scheduling and remote learning
- +Support for adult learners and military
- +Accessible and affordable education
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Faculty and teaching quality are criticized for prioritizing profit over education and lacking effective guidance.
- -Program disorganization and overwhelming course load create difficulty in tracking deadlines and managing studies.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant delays and confusion.
- -Lack of clear and consistent communication leads to misinformation.
- -Inconsistent policies and unfair grading practices are a recurring problem.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
- -Communication problems and a perceived lack of student support are frequently cited.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners commendable ratings across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving an impressive 4.39. Location and facilities also score highly, around 4.24 and 4.23 respectively. Student life and value are rated favorably at 4.14 and 4.05. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.59.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.75. **Location** and **Professors** also rank highly at 4.5. While **Accommodations** at 4.44 are strong, **Value** emerges as the comparatively weakest area, though still rated well at 4.3. The university also demonstrates a good level of **Internationality** with a 4.6 rating.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect scores, indicating outstanding strengths in these areas. Professors and the value proposition are also highly rated, demonstrating a very strong overall performance with minimal perceived weaknesses.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
With a 4.35/5 average rating from 156 reviews, ~87% praised diverse subjects, practical skills, international diversity, and career support. A small minority (~2.6%) cited poor management, communication, and disorganization.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 3.9/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic success, career preparation, and strong faculty engagement. Negative feedback (~20%) points to administrative and grading inconsistencies.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising flexibility, accessibility, and suitability for adult learners balancing other commitments. The average rating is 4.75 out of 5.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
