SKEMA Business School vs Hult International Business School vs Hochschule Fresenius vs Cedarville University vs INSEEC Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 269 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Cedarville University (5.00)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Hult International Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 0/6 categories
Cedarville University: wins 6/6 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Schiller International University: wins 0/6 categories
Southern New Hampshire University - SNHU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
63 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Cedarville, Ohio, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Hanove, New Hampshire, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
45 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.16
3.67
5.00
Win
3.43
3.83
3.95
Location
4.24
4.61
5.00
5.00
4.64
4.92
3.89
Professors
4.41
4.49
4.00
5.00
Win
3.86
4.58
4.62
Internationality
4.35
4.79
3.67
5.00
Win
4.50
4.92
4.53
Student life
4.10
4.20
3.33
5.00
Win
4.07
4.08
4.70
Value
4.03
4.15
4.00
5.00
Win
3.64
4.17
4.51
Accommodation
3.56
3.29
3.00
5.00
Win
2.50
3.67
4.47
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Strong networking and career opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world learning experiences
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff
  • +Supportive and friendly professors and staff
  • +Diverse student body and international interaction
  • +High-quality academic training
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
  • +Accessible and flexible online learning environment.
  • +Responsive and supportive faculty and staff.
  • +Well-structured and valuable academic programs.
Cons
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient materials are a concern.
  • -Inconsistent professor quality and teaching methods are disliked.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as poor or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization in administration.
  • -Poorly maintained facilities and outdated equipment.
  • -Insufficient academic support and unengaging teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

With high scores across most aspects, this institution excels in **Internationality** (4.79) and **Location** (4.61). Professors also receive strong marks (4.49). The weakest area for the university is **Accomodation**, which received a considerably lower rating (3.29) compared to other surveyed categories. Facilities (4.16), Student Life (4.20), and Value (4.15) fall within a solid mid-range.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Remarkably, this institution achieved perfect scores across every evaluated metric. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all received top marks. This indicates a consistently excellent experience for students in all aspects of their university journey, with no particular area standing out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

This university receives high marks across most aspects of student experience. Notably, Student Life and Professors are exceptionally strong areas, both scoring above 4.6. Accommodations, Internationality, and Value also perform very well, with scores exceeding 4.4. Facilities represent the lowest-rated category at 3.95, though it remains a respectable score.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

Overwhelmingly positive feedback highlights excellent career opportunities, networking, and practical learning experiences. A small percentage of reviews mention issues with professor quality and program materials.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for friendly, supportive professors and staff. Diversity through international students is also highlighted as a positive aspect.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

The ~100% of positive reviews highlight responsive faculty, flexible online learning with easy-to-navigate platforms, and well-structured programs. Students appreciate academic support and resources contributing to their success.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
54%
33%
100%
21%
67%
64%
4★
42%
30%
67%
0%
50%
25%
29%
3★
7%
13%
0%
0%
43%
0%
7%
2★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
1★
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

DIVERSITY

One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close