SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs EPF Graduate School of Engineering - EPF vs IUT De Sceaux vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 246 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Schiller International University (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EPF Graduate School of Engineering - EPF: wins 1/7 categories
IUT De Sceaux: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Aeronautics and Space
Sceaux, France
3.70
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.24
4.18
4.00
3.92
4.33
4.47
Win
Location
4.25
3.78
4.27
3.20
4.93
Win
4.50
3.13
Professors
4.39
4.33
4.27
4.00
4.64
4.80
Win
4.27
Internationality
4.39
4.43
4.27
3.90
4.93
Win
4.60
3.87
Student life
4.13
4.15
4.64
Win
4.20
4.15
4.33
4.20
Value
4.05
4.07
4.45
4.00
4.29
4.00
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.60
3.20
4.09
3.00
3.62
3.00
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
  • +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
  • +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
  • +High-quality, practical teaching from experienced professors
  • +Strong industry connections and career support
  • +Valuable alumni network and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse specializations and flexible program to find vocation
  • +International opportunities and engaging student life
  • +Practical learning through projects and supportive professors
  • +Relevant practical experience and industry-connected faculty
  • +High-quality educational system overall
  • +Strong recommendation to others
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Strong career advancement and market-relevant skills.
  • +High-quality faculty and engaging curriculum.
  • +Welcoming community and supportive staff.
  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Poor management and administrative issues.
  • -Ineffective communication and guidance.
  • -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
  • -Steep tuition fees strain financial investment.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Course content and teaching quality can be disappointing.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are prevalent.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception across key aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Conversely, accommodation was rated lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded student experience with areas for potential improvement.

Across surveyed categories, the institution demonstrates a strong profile. Student Life stands out as the highest-rated aspect, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, Accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value are all positive and generally align with each other, painting a picture of a well-rounded university experience.

Overall, this institution garners a strong performance with an average rating of 3.8. Student life shines brightest, achieving an impressive 4.2, closely followed by facilities and value, both scoring a solid 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, receiving a rating of 3. Location also falls slightly below the average at 3.2.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This university garners exceptional scores in academic and social aspects, with Professors receiving a near-perfect 4.8 and Internationality a strong 4.6. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded at 4.33. Location and Value are solid at 4.5 and 4 respectively. However, Accomodation stands out as a weaker area, scoring a significantly lower 3.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.

~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, and strong corporate/alumni networks for career development. One review expressed concerns about high tuition fees relative to investment.

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight diverse majors, international opportunities, and engaging project-based learning as key strengths.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, reviews are largely positive, highlighting the quality of the system and helpful professors. One review specifically praised the work-study program and recommended the university. No negative feedback was recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

With 100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight strong career advancement and valuable skills gained. Frequent themes include high-quality courses, competent professors, and practical relevance. Some students desired stronger post-graduation support and a more engaged alumni network.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
39%
36%
0%
71%
40%
47%
4★
42%
52%
64%
50%
21%
60%
47%
3★
7%
9%
0%
50%
0%
0%
7%
2★
1%
2%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close