Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Estonian Business School - EBS vs Hanken School of Economics
Side-by-side comparison from 110 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary learning and study freedom
- +International community and diverse peers
- +Rigorous curriculum and independent learning
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Supportive staff and community
- +Practical, business-focused programs
- +Good work-life balance and flexibility
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +High teaching quality and experienced lecturers
- +Engaging international environment
- +Helpful support services
- +International environment and intercultural exchange
- +Supportive staff and excellent student guidance
- +Diverse and flexible study programs with practical skills
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of adequate student support services is a major concern.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and outdated teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Student life and facilities stand out as particularly strong points, both receiving high marks. Conversely, professors are rated the lowest among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile, with accommodations, internationality, and value also scoring well. Location also received a favorable rating.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution shines particularly bright in Location and Internationality, both scoring exceptionally high. Student Life, Accomodation, and Value also receive favorable marks, suggesting a positive overall experience. However, the ratings indicate that Professors are the weakest area, with a considerably lower score compared to other categories. Facilities are rated well, but also fall behind the top-performing aspects.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, alongside a strong rating for Value. Accommodations are also well-regarded. However, the university's Internationality score is notably lower than other aspects, indicating a potential area for development. The location also received a good, but not perfect, rating.
Overall, the university receives high marks. Student life stands out as the strongest area, closely followed by facilities and internationality. Accommodations and location also score very well. Value for money is a notable strength. The professors' ratings, while still good, represent the weakest area in this assessment.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting opportunities for personal and academic growth, international connections, and freedom in studies. A small minority (~7%) provided no negative feedback, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With an average rating of 4.42/5, nearly all ~83% of reviews highlight a supportive community and concrete, business-oriented studies. Students appreciated staff helpfulness, international program flexibility, and work-life balance. No negative feedback was reported.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, this university is highly praised for its excellent teaching quality and strong international environment. Positive feedback highlights engaging academics and helpful support services.
Students praise SEAMK for its international environment, supportive staff, and diverse courses. The learning atmosphere is described as friendly and inclusive, with excellent guidance and opportunities for intercultural exchange. No negative feedback was provided in the sample.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The school has great facilities and modern equipment. Teachers have huge amount of knowledge and are well informed about new technologies. The studying is made mostly in a way that the student doesn't have to buy expensive books or equipments. Also the school is really investing on being international and there is lot of collaboration between different schools from different countries although they should advertise about exchange programs more.
Nothing to show
