Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Estonian Business School - EBS vs Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences - SeAMK
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Independent learning, flexibility, and practical, hands-on experiences
- +Strong sense of community, readily available support, and active student life
- +Excellent facilities and multidisciplinary, diverse course opportunities
- +Strong sense of community and support
- +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
- +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
- +Passionate and supportive educators
- +Practical, career-focused, and well-structured programs
- +International and friendly learning environment
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Supportive staff and environment
- +Quality education and flexible programs
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder progress.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a consistent complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a solid reputation across multiple facets. Areas like Facilities and Student Life received particularly high marks. Internationality and Value also stood out positively. While still strong, Professors were rated slightly lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for students.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Its Facilities and Internationality are also highly regarded, alongside a strong showing for Value. Conversely, Accomodation is rated slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly in areas directly related to learning and global engagement.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Across various metrics, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life** and **Facilities**, both scoring an impressive 4.75 and 4.7 respectively. **Internationality** also ranks highly at 4.7. Conversely, the **Professors** category received the lowest rating at 3.9, indicating an area for potential improvement. Ratings for Location, Accommodation, and Value remain consistently strong, all above 4.4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92%), with students praising flexible learning, excellent facilities, and active student life. A few reviewers mentioned that courses sometimes lack depth.
Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.
With all 25 reviews being positive, students praise supportive and passionate teachers, practical and career-focused programs, and a rewarding academic experience. An average rating of 4.88/5 reflects this strong satisfaction.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
With a 4.6/5 average rating and 0% negative feedback, reviews highlight supportive staff, a friendly learning environment, quality education, and great student life. Students appreciate inclusivity, creativity, and diverse, flexible study programs with international exchange opportunities.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Nothing to show
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Nothing to show
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
The school has great facilities and modern equipment. Teachers have huge amount of knowledge and are well informed about new technologies. The studying is made mostly in a way that the student doesn't have to buy expensive books or equipments. Also the school is really investing on being international and there is lot of collaboration between different schools from different countries although they should advertise about exchange programs more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
