Università degli Studi di Trieste vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Rome Business School vs MIB Trieste School of Management vs International School for Advanced Studies SISSA

Side-by-side comparison from 172 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International Centre for Theoretical Physics - ICTP (5.00)
Università degli Studi di Trieste: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/7 categories
Rome Business School: wins 0/7 categories
MIB Trieste School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
International School for Advanced Studies SISSA: wins 0/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 0/7 categories
International Centre for Theoretical Physics - ICTP: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: International MBA
Best programme: MBA in International Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Best programme: Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
3.92
4.23
4.65
Not rated
4.71
5.00
Win
Location
4.75
4.23
4.60
4.75
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Professors
4.33
4.14
4.51
4.68
Not rated
4.71
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.11
4.22
4.80
4.61
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Student life
4.13
4.06
4.25
4.72
Not rated
4.57
5.00
Win
Value
4.44
4.14
4.44
4.70
Not rated
4.86
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.14
3.78
3.94
4.49
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Engaging courses and good study environment.
  • +Enjoyable extracurricular activities and city life.
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +Practical, real-world application of theory
  • +High-quality faculty with professional experience
  • +Engaging and inspiring learning experiences
  • +Experienced professors and interactive teaching
  • +Strong industry focus and practical experience
  • +Supportive international environment and networking opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
  • +High-quality teaching and research
  • +Focus on diversity and international culture
  • +Valuable student support services
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessionalism and corruption.
  • -Lack of promised resources and outdated/inadequate course content.
  • -Difficulty reaching staff and unresolved technical/system issues.
  • -Overpriced tuition and hidden fees are a major concern for students.
  • -Poor quality of education and irrelevant curriculum leave students unsatisfied.
  • -Inadequate facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is undoubtedly **Location**, scoring a high 4.75. **Professors** also receive excellent marks at 4.33. Conversely, **Internationality** is the weakest area, with a rating of 4.11, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.125. Overall, the university performs well across its various aspects.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

A generally positive university review highlights exceptional strength in **Internationality**, scoring a near-perfect 4.8. **Location** also stands out with a high rating of 4.6. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score, at 3.94, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Value also garnered strong marks above 4.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Location and Student Life receiving the highest scores. Professors and Value are also highly regarded, indicating a positive academic and financial experience. Accomodation emerges as the relatively weaker point in this assessment, though still holding a solid rating. Overall, the university presents a very appealing profile to its students.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

This institution achieves a perfect score of 5 across all evaluated aspects. The university excels uniformly in its facilities, the quality of its professors, desirable location, vibrant student life, accommodation offerings, international outlook, and overall value. No specific areas emerge as stronger or weaker, as all categories demonstrate an outstanding performance.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.18/5. Students highlighted wonderful experiences, meeting interesting people, learning valuable theory and practice, and a nice studying environment with helpful professors.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), praising practical learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~6%) of feedback highlights issues with diploma delivery, administrative support, and perceived unprofessionalism.

All 44 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.82/5. Students praise dynamic classes, expert professors, and international industry focus. The location and networking opportunities are also frequently highlighted.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%) highlights productive and interesting experiences due to high-quality teaching, research, and promotion of diversity.

Rating distribution
5★
18%
36%
70%
82%
0%
86%
100%
4★
82%
41%
20%
18%
0%
14%
0%
3★
0%
23%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Great year

Enrolling in the International Master in Project Management has been an incredible milestone for my professional development. The curriculum perfectly balances core theoretical methodologies with practical, real-world case studies, making every concept immediately applicable to real workplace scenarios. ​Beyond the quality of the coursework, what truly sets this program apart is the level of mentorship. I am deeply grateful to Gianmarco and the entire academic team for their hands-on support, responsiveness, and continuous guidance throughout the journey. I highly recommend this master’s program to any professional looking to refine their strategic mindset, sharpen their leadership capabilities, and elevate their career in project management.

Deep practical knowledge over superficial theory

The core strength of MIB Trieste lies in its sharp focus on practical application. Rather than providing superficial high-level overviews, the curriculum delivers real depth across every module, ensuring you walk away with usable, actionable knowledge rather than just academic theories. The program bridges high-level strategic concepts with real-world execution very effectively. ​If there is one area with room for improvement, it would be the career placement framework, which could be slightly more proactive in supporting candidates during their job search. That said, the academic rigor and practical readiness you gain more than compensate for it, making it a valuable experience overall. I highly recommend it to professionals looking for solid operational knowledge.

Nothing to show

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close