University of Groningen - RUG vs University of Twente vs Rotterdam School of Management - RSM vs TSM Business School vs Fontys University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 333 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality faculty and innovative teaching
- +State-of-the-art facilities and extensive campus amenities
- +International atmosphere and opportunities for self-development
- +International and multicultural environment
- +High-quality, progressive, and interdisciplinary education with good support
- +Hands-on research, project-based learning, and manageable workload
- +Comprehensive and specialized business programs with diverse course offerings.
- +Expert faculty and strong academic support fostering a great learning environment.
- +International atmosphere, networking opportunities, and high-quality education.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and caring staff
- +Practical and international experience opportunities
- +Strong academic foundation and career preparation
- +Practical, career-oriented curriculum and useful course content
- +Supportive and friendly teachers providing concrete feedback
- +Welcoming international environment and comfortable study spaces
- +Welcoming atmosphere and helpful staff
- +Practical, project-based learning (DBE)
- +Opportunities for real-world experience and international exposure
- -Lack of support and high failure rates create a negative academic environment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues contribute to confusion and frustration.
- -Toxic culture and discrimination negatively impact student well-being and integration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a recurring concern.
- -Students frequently express frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -A lack of relevant curriculum and teaching quality is a significant point of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of personal interaction with professors and feeling like a number.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring concern.
- -The course content and teaching methods are perceived as uninspiring.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of perceived learning despite accumulating credits.
- -Indifference from faculty and management to student concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus conditions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented by many students.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher support are major issues.
- -Disorganization and unclear assessments lead to student confusion.
- -Inconsistent feedback and arbitrary grading practices are frustrating.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.21). **Facilities** (4.15) and **Location** (4.07) also receive strong scores. The primary area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating (2.90). **Professors** (3.84) and **Value** (4.02) are rated moderately.
This institution presents a compelling picture, with its facilities receiving the highest marks at 4.33. Notably strong are location and internationality, both scoring 4.11, closely followed by value at 4.17. The weakest area identified in the ratings is accommodation, which stands at 3.65. Professors also received a solid, though comparatively lower, rating of 3.83.
This institution exhibits a very strong overall profile, with exceptional ratings in **Internationality (5.0)** and **Location (4.71)**. **Facilities** also score highly at **4.67**. The **Accommodation** category, while still positive, shows the lowest score at **4.0**. Other areas like Student Life and Value are well-received, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Nothing to show
Offering a robust academic and campus experience, this university shines brightest in its **Facilities**, receiving a 4.42 rating. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.29. While **Location** and **Value** both score well at 4.25, **Student Life** is rated slightly lower at 3.83. The area with the most room for improvement is **Accomodation**, which received a 3.36 rating.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in internationality, earning a rating of 4.42, and excels in facilities and value, both scoring 4.33. Student life is rated 3.67, slightly above the professor rating of 3.58. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 3.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in **Facilities** (4.41) and **Internationality** (4.46), indicating a robust and globally connected campus environment. Student life also scores well at 4.07. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.62) and **Professors** (3.81) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
~72% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and an international atmosphere. ~11% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with academic support and student care.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~91% of reviews), with students praising the multicultural environment, progressive curriculum, and hands-on research. Some mention outdated tools, while others note manageable workloads and good career prospects.
Around 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting interesting courses, good organization, and professional faculty. A small portion of feedback (about 9%) mentions large class sizes and limited professor interaction.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 96% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, great facilities, and valuable opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~4%) expresses concerns about learning outcomes.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and supportive teachers. Some mention occasional disorganization and a chaotic online platform. No negative reviews were received.
Around ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere and practical, project-based learning. A smaller portion (~6.4%) of feedback criticizes poor organization, unclear assignments, and a lack of teacher availability or feedback.
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
A good program to get to know different aspects of your study. Courses share an interaction with one main project in each quartile. Most teachers love their job and are interesting to listen to. The campus is set up really nicely, good to enjoy during breaks.
Erasmus university especially RSM is known as one of the best business school in Europe. IBA is a great program for anyone would like to study business. The curriculum cover broad topics in business area with a possibility to choose your specialization. Also there are a lot of opportunities to participate in exchange, internship, or minor in other faculties. I would recommend this program for anyone interested in business study.
Nothing to show
I like the possibility to self study, find materials and information, as well as the freedom of learning what I am interested in, while receiving feedback from my teachers which helps me getting on the right track.
Saxion - CMGT - Creative Media and Game Technologies - 2.5/5 TLDR: I only recommend the CMGT course to someone who is already disciplined to REALLY study the gaming topic they are interested in outside the dedicated time for the university. If you are looking for a course that makes you "game industry ready" look elsewhere. I finished the CMGT (Creative Media and Game Technologies) course as an artist in 2022. I went to Saxion (Enschede) with the dream of becoming a concept artist for video games (as advertised on the official website), after 4 years and €10000 dept I can say that I would have gotten the same knowledge out of top €1000 in relevant courses. A lot of the topics we went through are just "oh that's interesting to know, so when can I learn to draw concept art?". There was a lack of focus for artist in general (2D and 3D), you never get deep into any topic and most things except the bare basics are for you to learn in your own time. In addition, the amount of actual gaming projects is laughable for a course that advertises itself as gaming focused. But there were good things, even great things. The fellow students were very great partners and the teachers are knowledgeable and easy going. There is a very low focus on "memorize this and write it down" type test. 95% of the (art) grades are project based, meaning you create something (concepts, prototypes etc.) with other CMGT students (Other branches of CMGT are programmer and designer). Enschede itself is a great city to life in, with more than enough places to visit to fill the years with activities. In the last 2 years the students focus on larger projects, and for me, it was the case that the actual document that will be uploaded is much, much more important than the actual product we create. This was very frustrating because as an artist, I want to make things, not write documents all day. I would only recommend the CMGT to someone that is: 1) In need of a guided education about the basics of game making (equivalent of easy to get courses online) but more expensive of course 2) Interested in living in the Netherlands and experiencing the culture 3) Looking for an "easy" bachelor that can be obtained if you put in a bit of effort 4) A hardworking individual that does the bachelor on the side while advancing in their own domain of interest. Afterword: At the end of my study, I was so removed from what I actually wanted to learn that I could not advance professionally in the field I wanted to work in (concept art). Instead, I learned some things about UI design, which to be honest is a topic I really don't care about. **Important Note: The last 2 years of my studies were impacted by the covid pandemic.
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
